redflyer65
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Posts
- 4,456
Wrong again.
SLI #1, which the MEC voted down for the POS it was, would have eliminated all 717 CA seat protections if there was a reduction of even 1 airframe from that fleet. Yet SWA kept saying all along that they were going to keep that plane until natural lease expiration beginning in 2017 and going through 2023; and kept saying this even while they were trying to get Delta to sublease them.
As for "smaller companies"...that may apply to anything outside of airlines. But with airlines there are laws in place such as Allegheny-Mohawk and Bond-McCaskill to see to it that the pilots of the acquired airline do not get sent to the street; a concrete item that you still fail to understand.
Don,
Good luck with the anger dude. I know you didn't ask for this and neither did we. I get the fact that you may have never applied to SW or even wanted to be here. Your NC negotiated deal one. They saw merit in it. You should have been able to vote on it....whether it would have passed or not will never be known now. They short circuited your choice. Gary gave his best offer up front. Plenty here said the second offer would pale in comparison. As Whine said, you could have voted SAI2 down as well. Offer three would have been worse. The Airtran MEC hosed every single one of you.
RF