slaquer5
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2005
- Posts
- 1,282
As a SWA employee I'm happy to see them make a run at those gates. Southwest might have to step it up a bit. Competition is great thing!
+1
Very well said .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As a SWA employee I'm happy to see them make a run at those gates. Southwest might have to step it up a bit. Competition is great thing!
Just thinking -
You're a SWA rookie- the ship ain't gonna sink or swim based on your opinion of things- which are.... "New"
Obviously SWA has a huge incentive to outbid anyone for the gates, IF they are allowed to bid.
Really?
We need more of you? We need more pilots who whine and bitch incessantly? Who do nothing but denigrate our product on a public forum ("our product is crap!"), with every opportunity they get? That's what we need? Can you explain how that will help anything?
We as pilots ARE aware of the problems our airline faces (on-time, baggage, etc.). And no, we don't think that those issues are "okay." But I'm pretty sure that the way for pilots to address them is by working with the company, and showing how specific issues may be addressed. Give them a frontline view, as it were. Seeing as how we don't write the checks, and can't just snap our fingers and make operational changes. Responsible leaders act that way.
And you know what? It has an effect. After the January MDW meltdown, VPOps Van de Ven blamed the weather and new part 117 rules as the "culprit." The union immediately took them to task, privately and without fanfare, and then presented them with a report from the frontlines, with input from 1.500 pilots, explaining what actually happened and why things broke down. Guess what? The company agreed and changed tacks. They've created a new office, staffed by a pilot (Chuck Magill, formerly VPFltOps) to oversee and address operational issues noted and experienced by crews as they happen. In other words, they listened to us. They've also changed the way calculate turn times and connection times throughout the day to allow for contingencies that frontline employees see, but that Dallas managers may not see (although this large change in flow planning won't happen until late May or June, due to lead time in scheduling and selling flights). This is to address "ripple delays" from waiting for slow connections. Don't know that this will solve all our operational issues (we still need to address ramp staffing), but it's definitely a start.
On the other hand, maybe you're right; maybe the answer is to just complain and moan on anonymous forums, like whiny little bitches, and hope that GK and VdV happen to read FI in their spare time. Maybe that'll produce better results.
Bubba
Confident in their success? You do realize they have yet to make money?
And that he's touting two former AA managers that helped American into bankruptcy, but left before the shoe could hit the ground. I'm not sure Carty or Cush are anything to get excited about. And the CFO is a disaster.
And to your line of thinking regarding the $49 fare, what's to keep SW from lowering the fare on the VA routes out of DAL? The Orange Co remark still stands. Unbelievable wealthy passengers that want to travel. It's tough to NOT make money in SNA. ie, cash cow.
I hope it works out for them, but historically it doesn't look stellar.
SNA's lift was funneled for DFW flights. Anyway, the guy leading the charge for this direction used to work at Alaska and WestJet, where he helped create their current robust route structures. Give this guy a chance.
Bubba,
The STFU crowd is just like the rest of our PC culture in that you can't say anything that does not agree with the current koolaid flow or you are a heretic, hater or some kind of a 'phobe.
LUV