USAPA Trial

[BeCareful!]

My opinon: if USAPA wins the West will continue undermining USAPA at every turn and try to make the East live under LOA 93 forever.

Well now, that's productive.

 

[TWA Dude]

So's the fact we probably could've had a new contract back in 2007.

 

[BeCareful!]

So's the fact we probably could've had a new contract back in 2007.

Yeah. So, what's your point?

 

[TWA Dude]

Your side started this mess. Don't expect us to finish it.

 

[eaglesview]

What's each side going to do if they loose?

No matter what happens there will be endless bitch sessions going on and nothing resolved.

 

[TWA Dude]

Ah, yes, more wisdom from United's own USAPA apologist.

 

[FDJ2]

"USAPA officials, who, like those on the America West side, declined to comment in advance of the trial, have maintained from the start that the arbitrator's decision was never final or binding and was just a proposal."

You've got to be kidding me, right?

 

[michael707767]

"USAPA officials, who, like those on the America West side, declined to comment in advance of the trial, have maintained from the start that the arbitrator's decision was never final or binding and was just a proposal."

You've got to be kidding me, right?

They think if they say it enough, it will be true.

 

[PHXFLYR]

"USAPA officials, who, like those on the America West side, declined to comment in advance of the trial, have maintained from the start that the arbitrator's decision was never final or binding and was just a proposal."

You've got to be kidding me, right?

Nope. Apparently their legal team honestly thinks seniority "lives in the contract and is negotiable like crewmeals " And yes. That was an exact quote.


PHXFLYR

 

[PHXFLYR]

Well now, that's productive.

Whassamatta ???? Need a payraise???


PHXFLYR

Proud non-member

 

[Colonel Savage]

Whassamatta ???? Need a payraise???

Ahem, "pay restoration"....

 

[Cowboy75]

"USAPA officials, who, like those on the America West side, declined to comment in advance of the trial, have maintained from the start that the arbitrator's decision was never final or binding and was just a proposal."

You've got to be kidding me, right?

It all depended on the outcome. It was only a proposal when they did not agree with the decision.

There you have it, no integrity.

 

[PHXFLYR]

It all depended on the outcome. It was only a proposal when they did not agree with the decision.

There you have it, no integrity.

You can say that again.


PHXFLYR

 

[FDJ2]

Nope. Apparently their legal team honestly thinks seniority "lives in the contract and is negotiable like crewmeals " And yes. That was an exact quote.


PHXFLYR

Unbelievable. I don't doubt you one second, I just find it incredible that they would proffer the idea in court that a final and binding seniority award is a proposal subject to negotiations.

 

[Raoul Duke]

My understanding is that the Judge made it perfectly clear that he does not buy in to that thinking. USAPA's attorneys got schooled in the arbitration and do not seem to have gotten any smarter. The latest I heard is that they fought very hard to prevent Bradford from having to testify. They were unseccessful and Bradford was ordered to appear in Phoenix.