GogglesPisano
Pawn, in game of life
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2003
- Posts
- 3,939
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ailerongirl said:OMG!
Firstly...your avatar is creepy!
Secondly....I do hope your 'I <3 crew scheduling' is meant in jest! (Unless you're a scheduler!)
I would think that analogy would only be valid if there wasn't an excedence of a tailwind or runway condition limitation or landing distance computation.TurboS7 said:The public needs to realize that a good landing is one at the 1000 to 1500 foot mark requardless of the impact. If one lands 1000 feet down the runway and it is a greaser then I guess the captain or fo is entitled to enjoy the atttaboys from the pax, anything else and the pax are being spun.
Why couldn't it be windshear, if your head wind shears to a tailwind at the surface, it will still affect your landing distance. Even if the windshear was a complete surprise...it still affects the plane.publishers said:The thhing that gets me is the one who is saying that it could not have anything to do with windshear because that only effects you in flight. There are still a ton of possibilities here, extra airspeed, gusts, crosswind component changing etc.
That is the spitting image of Tammy Faye Bakker when she was in grade school.GogglesPisano said:That is the most disturbing avatar -- make that picture, period -- I have ever seen.
Please make it stop.
mar said:Did someone already state the length of the runway?
To me, that's relevant.