Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing. The court overturned the case based on ripeness, not merit. They made no ruling on the merits of the case.Read the first red highlights. Seems to me it says, even if the proposal is not the NIC, that in itself does not work the disadvantages the Plaintiffs fear.
What's the line mean to you?
I don't see the connection between the grievance and the seniority list. I fully expect the company to win but just for the sake of discussion if they lost I'd expect them to go through bankruptcy again to mitigate it.As to what the company thinks??? I'm sure their thinking will change upon the outcome of the LOA 93 grievance.
Read the first red highlights. Seems to me it says, even if the proposal is not the NIC, that in itself does not work the disadvantages the Plaintiffs fear.
What's the line mean to you?
Additionally, USAPA’s final proposal may yet be one
that does not work the disadvantages Plaintiffs fear, even if
that proposal is not the Nicolau Award.3
Vacation, well that was a sell out by ALPA....don't get me started on that thinking.
ALPA National sold you out on a vacation proposal? I call BS on that.
Why is it always someone else's fault with you guys?
Local ALPA and their national advisers. 2nd bk, they had to give the company relief of items to save the company money.
One of things given back was Vacation for those 8 yrs and under. WOW what a cost savings the company received from that 0 dollars. There wasn't anyone on property with less than 8 yrs at that time, BUT ALPA goons gave it away!??! Why? Advisers obviously costed out the proposals...no? peanut butter jars on and off the shelf.
So (essentially), once again... ALPA / National / Senior...sold out those jr.
Local ALPA and their national advisors. 2nd bk, they had to give the company relief of items to save the company money.
One of things given back was Vacation for those 8 yrs and under. WOW what a cost savings the company received from that 0 dollars. There wasn't anyone on property with less than 8 yrs at that time, BUT ALPA goons gave it away!??! Why? Advisors obviously costed out the proposals...no? peanut butter jars on and off the shelf.
So essientially, once again... ALPA / National / Senior...sold out those jr.
YOUR senior pilots sold out guys who hadn't been hired yet in an effort to save their pensions. You played a gamble and lost. Stop blaming ALPA national for your own failings.
No you D** Sh*** those guys had been hired....thank you.
No wonder AW was where it was.....comprehension of 4th graders...
Pay is just a small part of the nightmare called LOA 93. Have you seen the work rules, vacation and forced 95 hour months. If a flight is canceled out East, hope a nice trip is in open time or there goes your pay! Seperate ops is not a solution for USAPA to avoid the NIC., but the WEST and the company will one day get to a joint contract with or without EAST participation, I'm betting on BK.
Nothing. The court overturned the case based on ripeness, not merit. They made no ruling on the merits of the case.
I don't see the connection between the grievance and the seniority list. I fully expect the company to win but just for the sake of discussion if they lost I'd expect them to go through bankruptcy again to mitigate it.