get2flyin
Flyinawa!
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
- Posts
- 794
Hence why it's tied up waiting for the arbitrator.
As most people understand, Airline contracts become amendable at a certain date, and do not "expire" Same with LOA's, UNLESS there is a definitive drop dead date stated.
LOA's and contracts continue into perpetuality until they are replaced with another agreed upon contract.
So, LOA 93 doesn't have an "expiration" date on it, BUT the pay freeze has a specific time frame listed. Why was that?
I believe that's the argument. Inherited management (who wasn't involved) says the dates mean nothing. USAPA says it's a drop dead date.
I suppose when the arbitrator is done with his hip surgery and moving his son to Russia, we will find out....
Well, if USAPA said it you can take it to the bank. They certainly wouldn't be giving the majority group of the membership (*that they exclusively represent) little more than lip service. Besides, the true beauty of the situation is that if the membership thinks the ruling is "unreasonable", just blow it off. Tell anyone who will listen that the company may have beaten USAPA but those scoundrels never honestly represented the poor average East pilot. Hell, have an election and vote in the "ALPUSA" (Air-Line Pilots of USAir) and then say nothing is legally binding. That would TOTALLY work...at least that's what I heard.