regionaltard
seat lock
- Joined
- May 22, 2005
- Posts
- 951
One could argue that the EC, or even the BOD, could determine that the policy was not followed and void the award.
Now there's a way to restore some credibility to the process. Can we get a do-over on the alter ego thing too?
It's arguable that the EC or BOD should have gotten involved and told the East to put down the DOH crack pipe but they didn't. Could the East have gotten a better deal? Sure they could have, but they needed to make their case before the fact. They bet the ranch, and they lost. You'd better believe that we'd be talking about windfalls had their absurd argument prevailed.