Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

US Airway news - not good

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If its between jobs at 1/2 their wages, or keeping their pention.. I wonder which one they'll take?

I'll bet a lot of those senior guys at UslessAir will want to take their pention and run... God Speed.
 
from us daily

******** U S A I R W A Y S T O D A Y ********

Monday, March 3, 2003

1/A Special Bulletin Saturday evening reported a
decision by U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Stephen
Mitchell that US Airways has met the financial
standards for a distress termination of the defined
benefit pension plan for its pilots. In response to
Judge Mitchell's decision, President and CEO Dave
Siegel said that US Airways and representatives of ALPA
should begin immediate negotiations. "The company
remains committed to providing $850 million over the
next seven years to fund a new pension plan for our
active pilots," said Siegel. "We have taken the
steps to terminate the existing plan only after we had
exhausted all other alternatives. But as we
demonstrated to the court over four days of testimony,
we cannot meet the financial obligations of the
existing plan and emerge from bankruptcy protection
without taking the action."

Siegel reiterated comments from his testimony in court
on Friday when he said that the airline's pilots had
shown tremendous leadership and sacrifice throughout
the company's restructuring process. "We regret the
impact that the plan termination will have on our
pilots but the ultimate goal must be to save this
airline and the jobs of almost 35,000 dedicated
employees. We respect ALPA's efforts to represent the
interests of its members and believe we can find a
mutually achieved solution to implement a new pension
plan." Please see the Special Bulletin for more
details.

2/The Department of Transportation has released its
March Air Travel Consumer Report, which contains
January 2003 statistics for ten major U.S. carriers.
US Airways ranked fifth in consumer complaints for
January 2003 with 1.20 complaints per 100,000
enplanements, and was equivalent to its January 2002
ranking. US Airways' January 2003 seventh-place ontime
performance ranking of 82.1 percent, which reflected
the impact of this winter's extreme weather conditions,
was slightly below the January 2002 level. US Airways'
3.95 percent fourth-place finish for number of
mishandled baggage in January 2003, was just below the
January 2002 level. Denied boarding statistics fell
slightly from last year to a January 2003 fifth-place
ranking at .66 percent per 10,000 passengers.
 
I paid ALPA dues for years and when I was out of work the support stopped. I found out the errors of false pride. That is why I am jerking gear today. Never will I pay ALPA another cent. Hasta La Vista baby!
 
ALPA is fighting this very hard. We will know more after the arbitration starts on the 13th Mar.
 
I find it ironic that a SWA/FO posts this-SWA being the one major airline in the world that is to cheap to even have a pension plan????????
 
hateairlines said:
I find it ironic that a SWA/FO posts this-SWA being the one major airline in the world that is to cheap to even have a pension plan????????

And what a lot of people don't understand, is that it only takes one airline to be cheap and the rest will have a hell of a time competing...
 
V70T5 said:
And what a lot of people don't understand, is that it only takes one airline to be cheap and the rest will have a hell of a time competing...


Sounds kind of socialistic.

Please tell what airline employs a man such as yourself. I am sure we can find fault with soemthing they are doing, or not doing, too.
 
Ty Webb said:
Sounds kind of socialistic.

Please tell what airline employs a man such as yourself. I am sure we can find fault with soemthing they are doing, or not doing, too.

You totally lost me.

What part of my statement above is socialistic... With an MBA in Business and a degree in Economics, I missed that lesson...

As for my "airline" it's, short answer is..

Ex-ASA
Furloughed American
Current Corporate CE560
(A good friend of mine and former pilot with us used to fly for Airtran, his last name was also Webb)
 
wait, wait, let me preempt a debate...

I'll explain my statement up front:

Airline A, B, C, and D all have x, y, z as expenses. Airlines A,B & C all also have an additional expense, we'll call it p (for pension).

Now if airline D starts to fly into the markets that airlines A, B, and C fly but at a cost of labor that is reduce by dollar amount "p", they are in fact able to make an additional profit equal to airlines A, B, and C, or if they want to be smart, they will fly at the same rate and make additional profits which we can call Delta "p"...

Thus airline D is more profitable and is able to have a higher stock price and therefore better access to capital to keep themselves in business.

Do you get it?
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top