Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was watching the NTSB lady, and she said that Sully was he pilot monitoring.
So does this mean the FO was the one who landed it in the water?
I read a news report last night that said he took the controls as the FO ran the checklists. With only a couple minutes, they didn't get down to hitting the ditching button. FWIW.
I don't think anyone's posted this yet, but here's a link to CNN's video released from a surveilance camera of the actual landing.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/01/17/usair.splash.video/index.html
The following videos shows part of the take off from LGA.
Also Cnn reported the pilots said they intentionally set it down near the ferry boat landings so that rescue could be expedited quickler.
Captain (19K) was monitoring and had approx. 3800 hrs. on the 320 and FO (20K) had 35 hrs. on the 320.
FO saw birds - captain was heads down when FO stated.
The SOP is to have the F/O fly and CA monitor. It is interesting that in the most dire situation you can face, folks revert to what is instinct (CA flying) rather than procedure. If this had not turned out as well, I wonder if this would be brought up as a causal factor.
Maybe the procedure needs to be revisited.
So do you think they will bust out the white paint and rollers this time?