sqwkvfr
Baseball junkie
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2003
- Posts
- 1,673
I've never heard of an intoxilyzer being that far off and within tolerances.AAflyer said:Some interesting items from another website.
The human body can produce a blood alcohol content of .015 through it's normal metabolic process without having ever ingested a drop of alcohol.
A glass of "fresh squeezed" orange juice can have as much natural alcohol as an O'douls non-alcohol beer. Up to 1/2 of 1 percent alcohol by volume.
The breathalizers approved by the FAA for testing pilots have an accuracy range of .015%
When X airline approved certain breathalizers; the manufacutor demonstrated it's capability on a test sample of air containing .0% alcohol. The machine tested the sample and produced a result of .015% alcohol! I was in the room along with other ALPA officials and several Vice-Presidents. The machine met standards and was approved!!
Are you certain that you didn't witness a test of a PBT? 99% of average folks don't know the difference.
An intoxilyzer is NOT a portable machine. They're tested often to be within standards (and .015 is NOT an acceptable standard) and are located within police stations, jails, or B.A.T.mobiles. PBT (portable breath testers) are the small little hand-held units that most people mistakenly believe to be an intoxilyzer.
Intoxilyzers results are allowed as evidence. Most PBTs and breathalyzers are not. I'm willing to bet that the result made public was almost certainly from an intoxilyzer.
Now some of you can understand why it took an hour for an intoxilyzer result. The pilot had to be taken to an intoxilyzer...since they're not mobile (with the exception of the BATmobile.)
Now, .10 or .08 BAC is gonna be tough to prove.....but FARs do not allow operation above .04%
...and that's gonna be a cinch to prove.
Expert testimony will (not maybe will, WILL) establish that the human body generally metabolizes alcohol at a rate of .015% per hour. Eating food doesn't matter, drinking coffee doesn't matter and taking cold showers doesn't matter. The only way to rid your system of alcohol is to metabolize it...and that happens at a rate of @.015% BAC/hour. The second BAC result demonstrated the the BAC was actually on it's way down (as opposed to rising from a person absorbing more alcohol into his/her blood from a stomach full of beer.)
Let's do the math here: .039 + .015 (for the hour that it took to get this person into a room containing an intoxilyzer) = .054%
If the flight was supposed to start an hour before the time the the test was performed, his BAC would have been .054% at that time...and that's a violation.
FN FAL: You know I love you to death, man, but you know as well as I do that that judge's opinion from the case you cited is the extreme minority opinion in the legal and justice communities. That man's opinion and a $1 will get you a soda out of the vending machine at the executive terminal in Tucson.
Why do you think the state's appealing his ruling??