Redtailer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2002
- Posts
- 395
I think redtailer's synopsis was a little overdramatic, but some of the points I think were OK.
I'm not sure where he got the triggers, unless you read some analyst's opinions and those were his/their guesses. If you listen to the quarterly conference calls, very often reporters will ask the executives about covenants and they won't answer. But somewhere in the 2B area there are probably some triggers where credit card suppliers, for example, will require a larger holdback for future purchases.
There is a reason why the execs would not answer. When the conference call took place the analysts hadn't had a chance to go through the 10-Q thoroughly enough and they only had a chance to glance at the numbers. Anytime execs start eluding questions like that there should be a red flag the size of Texas waving.
Just for the record unless I noted differently, all of the numbers I provided were not made up or are any type of subposition. They came straight from UAL's 2Q 10-Q filing. The numbers are buried but they are there.