koko nw
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2005
- Posts
- 231
WhiteCloud said:In the case of UAL .......only until tomorrow.
Where still here Einstein.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WhiteCloud said:In the case of UAL .......only until tomorrow.
.koko nw said:Where still here Einstein.....
skykid said:koko nw,
Go back and do a search of WhiteCloud's predictions on UAL. He has a tremendous yearning for UAL to go away.
For now.koko nw said:Where still here Einstein.....
WhiteCloud said:OK....I don't like UAL as a company. If you work there you probably don't either. Cancelled stock and big time management suits walking around with gobs of cash (some small portion of it used to be mine) tends to piss me off. Certainly UAL is going away though.....either piece by piece like it is now with only a shell remaining or all at once when the attorneys realize they have taken all they can from the bankruptcy process. What I really yearn for is for UAL to either survive OR fail so they can quit abusing the bankruptcy process and the people they owe money to.
BoeingBoy said:This one is gonna be exciting...
Let me get this straight, UAL is using bankruptcy law to abrogate employee contracts and work rules, but also wants the judge to force the employees to go to work for whatever pay/benefits the company says it can afford?
Paging Mr. Lincoln....and bring that 13th amendment with you...yes here it is...the Emancipation Proclamation...
I'll be amazed if the workers at UAL can be forced to work for whatever the company wants...
UAL's new service...Coffee, Cotton, Tobacco, and a few lashes for the cabin crew!
-Excuse me Stewardess, what's your name?
-Kunta Kinte!
-It's Stewardess, dang you! Learn your name!
-Kunta....Kinte...
Mugs said:Sounds like an Independence pilot to me. Soon he too may get to try out the bankruptcy process. After a few more $29 fare sales of course.
OHGOON said:The enablers of the status quo always excuse this by saying it was and is perfectly "legal" but just because it may be so does not make it right or ethical.