Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

UAL cuts capacity 4% Hows Jeff looking now?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Continental

Farting on your Jumpseat
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Posts
180
UAL cuts capacity 4% CEO says this place will suck 4% less now

March 7, 2011
EMPLOYEE BULLETIN: UNITED ANNOUNCES CHANGES
IN 2011 CAPACITY PLAN
In our February traffic release issued after the close of the stock market today, we announced
that we are reducing capacity this year in response to the recent increase in fuel prices.
Effective with our May schedule, we plan to reduce consolidated capacity by 1 percent from our
prior plan. Effective with our September schedule, we plan to reduce consolidated capacity by 4
percent from our prior plan.
In the fourth quarter specifically, we expect consolidated domestic capacity to decrease 5 percent
versus the same period last year. However, we plan to increase more profitable international
flying, and our consolidated international capacity in the fourth quarter is expected to be up by 2
percent, compared with the same period last year.
As a result of the capacity changes, for the full year 2011, we will reduce our domestic capacity
by 1.5 to 2.5 percent compared with 2010, while increasing 2011 international capacity by 2.5 to
3.5 percent compared with last year. So for the full year 2011, our consolidated capacity will be
about flat with what it was for 2010, rather than growing the 1 to 2 percent that we planned for
the year.
The capacity reductions will come from reducing flight frequencies, indefinitely postponing the
start of certain markets and exiting less profitable routes, primarily in our domestic schedule.
The modest increase in international capacity allocates our aircraft on more profitable routes.
We will announce details of specific schedule changes as they are finalized and entered into
seasonal schedules.
In addition, we are analyzing exiting certain less fuel-efficient aircraft from our fleet and will be
taking other cost-saving measures.
“High and rising fuel prices hurt our business and our financial results,” said Jeff. “Although
we’ve raised our fares recently, we aren’t fully recovering our increased costs, and higher fares
reduce demand. As a result, we need to reduce our capacity and allocate our aircraft carefully to
markets where we can make money.”
To deal with higher fuel prices, we have initiated several fare increases and fuel surcharges. In
addition, we continue to have an active fuel hedging program. For the first quarter of 2011, 63
percent of our expected fuel consumption is hedged, and for the full year, we have hedged 40
percent of our expected consolidated fuel consumption. Finally, we are running our operation
efficiently to reduce fuel consumption.
“We will continue to work together to run our operations as efficiently as possible in the face of
these high fuel prices. I appreciate the work that my co-workers are doing to keep the new
United focused on fuel efficiency,” Jeff said.
Capacity Reduction Q&A

2010 was a successful year for both United and Continental. Why are we reducing capacity
now?
In a rising fuel-price environment, more flights become unprofitable and unsustainable.
Even before the recent rise in the price of oil, we spent more money on fuel than on our people
worldwide, our aircraft worldwide, or our facilities worldwide – $9.6 billion in 2010, up 33
percent from 2009. Every $1 increase in the price of a barrel of oil costs us $100 million
annually. With higher fuel prices in 2011, we now expect to spend nearly $13 billion on fuel this
year.
For us to remain competitive and make money, we have to manage our capacity responsibly and
fly the right routes with the right frequency to permit us to remain profitable.

Other airlines are announcing reductions that only cut previously announced 2011 capacity
increases. Are we cutting more capacity than they are?
We are cutting the right amount of capacity for us to better match our capacity to demand and the
reduced profitability of our routes.

Aren’t there other ways that we can deal with higher fuel costs, such as raising fares,
adding fuel surcharges, additional fuel hedging or reducing non-operating expenses?
We have taken actions in all of these areas since the price of fuel began increasing in 2010. We
intensified those efforts in the fourth quarter and continued to do so in 2011. Managing capacity
will give us the ability to be more effective at pricing our product more appropriately for this fuel
environment.
It is important for us to note that, although we’ve had some success raising fares, we can’t expect
to fully offset the effects of higher fuel prices this way. Each fare increase reduces the
affordability of air travel, so fewer people travel, which means we have a smaller market to sell
into, and, therefore, we need fewer flights.

Are we going to pursue other cost-saving measures?
To try to remain profitable as we deal with extraordinary increases in fuel prices, we will need to
reduce costs as we reduce capacity. We will work together across the company to increase
efficiency and work to accelerate realization of cost synergies from our merger.

Will we involuntarily furlough frontline people as part of this capacity cut?
Not at this time. However, we can’t continue to cut capacity without also reducing the size of
the workforce. As always, we will attempt to mitigate any future employee impacts with
voluntary programs such as leaves, early outs, job-share and early retirement programs.

Will there be any involuntary reductions in management headcount as a result of this
capacity cut?
We expect that that there will be few, if any, management reductions, because we anticipate
vacancies will occur as some management co-workers decide not to relocate to Chicago or
Houston. Additionally, we expect to mitigate any management impacts with voluntary programs
such as leaves, early outs and early retirement programs.

Doesn’t it make sense to reduce more regional flying?
About half of our domestic capacity reduction will come from regional flying, much of it through
a reduction in daily frequencies or day-of-week flying and, in some cases, exiting routes. As the
world’s leading airline, we want to continue service to the communities in our network, which
also enables us to feed customers into our hub locations for access to our destinations around the
world.

What routes will be impacted?
We will share this information as we make the schedule changes.

How will I know how my hub or fleet is going to be affected?
As we finalize schedule changes, we will share the information with co-workers, customers,
community and government leaders and others. We realize that any changes can affect the lives
of our co-workers, and we will share the information as soon as possible.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile....

Southwest says February traffic is up 13 percent

Southwest Airlines said passenger traffic grew 13 percent in February as the carrier increased its network capacity by 8.6 percent.

The Dallas-based carrier's load factor also rose 3 percentage points to 76.9 percent for the month.

Southwest added that its passenger revenues per average seat mile increased between 8 and 9 percent in February.
 
I think the summer schedule at Southwest is going to be very busy. I hate to hear what's going on at UAL/CAL. I thought it was just United that was the incredibly shrinking airline, looks like they brought that with them.
 
Looks like 50 seaters on the way out on this one.

Consolidated Capacity...includes the regionals
 
Last edited:
Yes and CAL"s block hours are protected at 100% United's are only at what 90%.

You think all of that reduction is going to come via RJ?s think again.
 
Cal may suck but united swallows.
God damn can the pilots catch a freaking break.
Well the other 1/2 has got to come from either cal's'-500's or maybe uals 747's

Why isnt delta making any kinds of revisions to capacity?
Guess we will continue to shrink to profitability and give up more market share woohoo!
 
Why isnt delta making any kinds of revisions to capacity?

They're not in negotiations with their pilots. This is no less than the same thing CAL mgt has done for decades. They will forfiet market share and abandon solid ground just to make things look bad. We're beating him at the table so he is retaliating.
 
Either UAL parks the RJs or we strike. Mainline pilots better not get furloughed on this. It's time for the teens to hit the streets
 
They're not in negotiations with their pilots. This is no less than the same thing CAL mgt has done for decades. They will forfiet market share and abandon solid ground just to make things look bad. We're beating him at the table so he is retaliating.


Exactly. Jeff and his boyz got theirs, screw the rest of you. They got almost every employee group to take a pissant 2-3% pay raise and it appears that the pilots are finally not gonna cave on this one. So, step two in the mgmt play book; slash and burn. They'll so the same underhanded, back-stabbing, kick-you-in-the-nuts on the ground BS they did for C02. If you don't vote yes on this POS we are selling, we will furlough (insert number here), park all of the -500's, and eliminate the "A" fund lump sum option. This is EXACTLY what they did prior to C02. Why try something different when the same 62+ers will come out of the woodwork to keep things status quo. :uzi:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top