Leaked info - DOJ and US will settle next month. Will post more when received.
I believe it! Thanks for sharing man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Leaked info - DOJ and US will settle next month. Will post more when received.
I'm rooting for this..I'm not just not sure how valid a "leaked" rumor is of a settlement over a month away.
Leaked info - DOJ and US will settle next month. Will post more when received.
I'd like to believe that, but next month? Why? Seems to me that's plenty of time for the settlement to tank...
DOJ is going to get very embarrassed if this thing goes to trial.
I hope it doesn't go thru. Sounds like anti trust issues for sure.
I just won the lottery by sneaking in the back door to SWA. We don't need any more competition.
I hope it doesn't go thru. Sounds like anti trust issues for sure.
I just won the lottery by sneaking in the back door to SWA. We don't need any more competition.
I hope it doesn't go thru. Sounds like anti trust issues for sure.
I just won the lottery by sneaking in the back door to SWA. We don't need any more competition.
Really?! sending over any good-looking young Flight Attendants you may have left. You do that, and I'll call Gary and have him call of the dogs. Deal?
Bubba
Why don't they settle this the way all government deals are made. Couple hookers , couple grams of blow and a hot tub.
Settlement talks began today - still trying to research the mediator's background as I don't know his name yet.
How did the lobbying go today?
Source???
Scott Lent, Arnold and Porter LLP, re: Case 1:13-cv-01236
That doesn't say anything about settlement talks starting today!
My response was in reply to the question, I believe, a request for a source. Now if I could just get all the info the high level investors apparently receive I could have capitalized...oh well. Geesh, check this sh1t out! https://www.google.com/finance?cid=700867
I hope they are talking today, but you say it like it's factual when it's really your opinion based on the market. Is that correct?
I hope they are talking today, but you say it like it's factual when it's really your opinion based on the market. Is that correct?
Please reread post numbers 48 and 50.
Not trying to sound combative: rereading that thread makes it seem as though your source is Scott Lent. I'm assuming he's actually the supposed mediator, not your source.
Where did you see this info?
Pave Driver, PM sent, reply?