Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Tsa Mec

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Oneflap said:
I Let us know if you will have the chance to fly anything over 50 seats with you NO VOTE!!! good job.

I am not falling for this one; no way this is real, "chance to fly anything over blank blank seats...." this has to be an ALPA guy trying to stir the pot.
 
Last edited:
Oneflap said:
I did leave and now I will have the chance to advance....Lots of TSA people coming over saying the same thing. Let us know if you will have the chance to fly anything over 50 seats with you NO VOTE!!! good job.

Oneflap? Why does it matter how many seats and aircraft has? I work for a paycheck not for a seat count jacka$$.

There are alot more important things than the number of seats.
 
Smarta$$ said:
Oneflap? Why does it matter how many seats and aircraft has? I work for a paycheck not for a seat count jacka$$.

There are alot more important things than the number of seats.

IT matters because the majors have said the 50 seats are on their way out...(this is old news) and the future is in the 70 and 90 seat aircraft. this matters when they (TSA) eventually get rid of the 50 seats and invest their money in the new airline....I left because I do not believe in that airline and I will not work for them so I would rather take a seniority hit for my future in the long run.
 
Oneflap said:
IT matters because the majors have said the 50 seats are on their way out...(this is old news) and the future is in the 70 and 90 seat aircraft. this matters when they (TSA) eventually get rid of the 50 seats and invest their money in the new airline....I left because I do not believe in that airline and I will not work for them so I would rather take a seniority hit for my future in the long run.

ahh Mr. Airline Economist with the crystal ball...50 seat jets "on the way out so I have to fly (fill-in-the-blank) seaters for nothing to secure my future."

Thanks for the "old news" and the "future".

You should have just posted your last sentence and then I don't think anybody would have any arguments. The rest of it is pure b.s.
 
Oneflap said:
I did leave and now I will have the chance to advance....Lots of TSA people coming over saying the same thing. Let us know if you will have the chance to fly anything over 50 seats with you NO VOTE!!! good job.

What if there's no seats in back??? How much money can I expect to make then jacka$$???
 
QUAG said:
What if there's no seats in back??? How much money can I expect to make then jacka$$???

Maybe we can become a "UPS Express" carrier, they do pretty well with no seats in the back (sarcasm intended, for joking purposes only).
 
Oneflap said:
I did leave and now I will have the chance to advance....Lots of TSA people coming over saying the same thing. Let us know if you will have the chance to fly anything over 50 seats with you NO VOTE!!! good job.

And good for you. There are many ways to define advancement. I choose to define it as not having said "yes" to extending a marginal contract, flying larger jets for industry- lowering wages, and allowing management the opportunity to furlough out of seniority at their whim. With that in mind, I will take your comments as a compliment.
 
Oneflap said:
I did leave and now I will have the chance to advance....Lots of TSA people coming over saying the same thing. Let us know if you will have the chance to fly anything over 50 seats with you NO VOTE!!! good job.


Hopefully we will all have a chance to fly an aircraft with more that fifty seats....at a Major Airline. NOT at a Regional. And NOT for Regional pay.
 
Oneflap said:
I did leave and now I will have the chance to advance....Lots of TSA people coming over saying the same thing. Let us know if you will have the chance to fly anything over 50 seats with you NO VOTE!!! good job.

You know, *************************s would never exist if people didn't work there - then TSA would have gotten 70 seat airplanes with their NO vote. Good job, SCAB.
 
ERJFO said:
You know, *************************s would never exist if people didn't work there - then TSA would have gotten 70 seat airplanes with their NO vote. Good job, SCAB.

I think Oneflap may work for chitaco, but your point is still good and valid.
 
ERJFO said:
You know, *************************s would never exist if people didn't work there - then TSA would have gotten 70 seat airplanes with their NO vote. Good job, SCAB.
Hey Moran, if you would try learning to read other posts you would know that I do not work there and I dont agree with anyone who does. You would still not have that flying even if people refused to work at G**ET because TSA Mangagement and Ownership does not care about the pilot group or the MEC and would rather Drink the contents of a full lav than give them a 70 seat airplane. ERJFO..I do like your attention to detail though....did you learn that at purdue....at least Smarta$$ was awake in class that day.
 
Oneflap said:
Hey Moran, if you would try learning to read other posts you would know that I do not work there and I dont agree with anyone who does. You would still not have that flying even if people refused to work at G**ET because TSA Mangagement and Ownership does not care about the pilot group or the MEC and would rather Drink the contents of a full lav than give them a 70 seat airplane. ERJFO..I do like your attention to detail though....did you learn that at purdue....at least Smarta$$ was awake in class that day.

Didn't go to Purdue, sorry missed the part where you said you work not at GJs... But lets get real, if no one worked for an "alter ego" company the managment would have to give TSA the flying or do without it, both cases would be better than what is taking place now. Maybe if the mediator supported the TSA contract which was full of loop holes it wouldn't be this bad.
 
Jbitzer said:
It doesn't matter were this oneflap guy works he is still a tool.

Poor kid, the chq captains are going to have deal with him as he advocates more pay cuts and contract extensions, everytime he opens his mouth like a broken record..."but I want a CHANCE to fly something BIGGER!"
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom