Red,
I wasn't implying that the company would spin it in any way. As you said, "they are ruthless" and they don't care about what anyone thinks. The MEC, on the otherhand, has to answer to the pilots. If another proposal was made, without the groups consent, then the group obviously failed to make the point that we want a say. I think the only reason we had a say with the first proposal was purely political. The MEC had to have known that a majority was against the proposal and in letting us vote they averted a rebellion.
Nothing has changed in six years. When the company creates a new problem for the pilots; the pilots, the MEC, and the company handle it the same way every time. Don't you think it's getting old negotiating for things that were taken away, giving in for rights that were taken away, and not gaining anything. Even worse, we aren't going to get anything new for years to come if we offer another extension. The first extension should never have happened, nor should another.
I wasn't implying that the company would spin it in any way. As you said, "they are ruthless" and they don't care about what anyone thinks. The MEC, on the otherhand, has to answer to the pilots. If another proposal was made, without the groups consent, then the group obviously failed to make the point that we want a say. I think the only reason we had a say with the first proposal was purely political. The MEC had to have known that a majority was against the proposal and in letting us vote they averted a rebellion.
Nothing has changed in six years. When the company creates a new problem for the pilots; the pilots, the MEC, and the company handle it the same way every time. Don't you think it's getting old negotiating for things that were taken away, giving in for rights that were taken away, and not gaining anything. Even worse, we aren't going to get anything new for years to come if we offer another extension. The first extension should never have happened, nor should another.