Exskydiverdrivr said:
Primarily to all you youngsters who think that just because Mommy and Daddy paid for you to get a 4 yr degree and ratings, Or that by taking a commission in the Armed forces, that
you must be entitled to some kind of major carrier "birth-right".
Rant all you want about how some obviously uneducated and undeserving person is sitting in "your" seat.(sky-dud 25) I've read this in several threads now. Consider the road some of us uneducated and undeserving people have travelled to get here.
4 years construction. 6years enlisted Army. Took my college money and went to a 121 flight school. 1800 hrs dual given. 2 yrs corporate F.O. doing every job associated with the position. about 1500 hrs driving skydivers. Another 1 and 1/2 yrs Air Ambulance. Now at 6 years in a regional.
Still think you're better qualified than me? Answer yes and you are truly lying to yourself. Want to see this industry turn around? Quit thinking that by graduating from "The Academy" that you're better than all of those around you. And that you're ready to take the left seat of that shiny jet, and that you'll go anywhere and undercut anyone to do it.
First off, lemme apologize on behalf of those that act like a prick to you, second please don't lump all "younger" pilots into that group.
I'm gonna ask a very broad and general question, is it the total time or the attitude, or a combination that bothers you? Attitude I can understand, but if you don't see that these people had and will have this attitude from the begining and they will keep it through their entire careers, I don't know what to tell you. It's not the school(s) that bread the attitude, it's the individual.
On the point of raising pay and QOL by requiring a FAR change that puts a min number of hours on being a 121 FO. How is that going to work?? I am no contract guru but I don't think a company (PDT, ASA, COMAIR, etc) is going to say "Oh lookie, FOs are required to have 1500 TT and an ATP, lets raise FO pay". Maybe when negotiations come up, but only if all the senior captains (who outnumber the junior FOs) will agree to a lesser pay raise to raise first through fifth year FO pay. I would do it, would you, can you say the same for all you friends that are captains??
There is no need for a college degree to fly an airplane, ANYONE can fly an airplane safely and competently, ANYONE!!! All going to UND or ERAU, or Ohio or Purdue, etc offers is all your ratings, almost a guaranteed instructor job, an easy way to finance your training (student loans, scholarships, grants, etc) and a college degree so you have some other skill set if flying doesn't pan out for whatever reason. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Getting a degree before starting out into flyine (ie paying a lot of money for your ratings) is smart. You have something to fall back on incase you cant fly or find out the 121 or 135 or Corp. 91 world is not for you. Sure you spent some cash on the ratings BUT you also got your degree at the same time. Now you can fall back on that instead of having to go back to school while paying off your flying debt.
The way a lot of you describe these FOs sounds a lot like the FOs at my last job. Sunglasses inside, spikey hair, ratty uniforms etc, and all these guys had taken the "respectable" route. These guys had been there for a while, and all of us new guys were by the book, humble(d) and still got crap for being from UND. I don't think it's a TT
What's my point? Look at the individual not the school they came from or their TT.