~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
Max,
The British Imperial Gallon is 20% larger than ours and their emissions requirements not quite as strict. Those explain why my car, which gets 31MPG here, gets 36 to 37 there.
I'm all for consumption based taxes (as Adma Smith would be) since they are a market based solution which allows people the freedom to choose. Typically the Democrats have been against consumption taxes. Obama is not going to back a regressive consumption based tax, is he? After all, gas taxes have a greater percentage impact on low income people.
If you like consumption taxes, you should read up on the Fair Tax and change political parties.
American consumption is most closely related to American productivity. American GDP per capita is 1,100% higher than your worker's paradise south of Florida and 10% higher than France. If you want to look for real efficiency, go to a third world island where they have burned every tree of the island and see how that's working out.
America will of course benefit from more efficiency, but that is only a small part of the overall solution.
You call Americans "greedy and arrogant" do you have a clue which country by far and above funds private charities?
Your America bashing gets old, fast.
The British Imperial Gallon is 20% larger than ours and their emissions requirements not quite as strict. Those explain why my car, which gets 31MPG here, gets 36 to 37 there.
I'm all for consumption based taxes (as Adma Smith would be) since they are a market based solution which allows people the freedom to choose. Typically the Democrats have been against consumption taxes. Obama is not going to back a regressive consumption based tax, is he? After all, gas taxes have a greater percentage impact on low income people.
If you like consumption taxes, you should read up on the Fair Tax and change political parties.
American consumption is most closely related to American productivity. American GDP per capita is 1,100% higher than your worker's paradise south of Florida and 10% higher than France. If you want to look for real efficiency, go to a third world island where they have burned every tree of the island and see how that's working out.
America will of course benefit from more efficiency, but that is only a small part of the overall solution.
You call Americans "greedy and arrogant" do you have a clue which country by far and above funds private charities?
Your America bashing gets old, fast.
Last edited: