"The New ATA"

[Ty Webb]

2. "Mergers vs. Acquisitions". All mergers are acquisitions, period.

All Acquisitions, however, are not mergers.

A sale of some of the assets does not constitute a merger. If the AirTran deal was a merger, we would be acquiring all of your company, including its assets and its liabilities. Portions could be spun off, but there would be one company when it was finished. This deal, as proposed is not a merger, so let's stop misusing the word.

 

[CaptSeth]

This deal, as proposed is not a merger

No, it's a POS.

 

[Wiskey Driver]

Whiskey,
It's the cost of belonging to a union. No matter if it's a bankruptcy. AWA and ATA are ALPA. AWA has a publicly stated interest in acquiring all of ATA's assets and will bid as such. Therefore it is a merger, and ALPA has guidelines to follow. Well not really, I saw as I am sure you did that it's an offer to aquire not merge. That is a big difference!!!


AT&T and Cingular, Sears and K-Mart, both are recent merger/acquisitions, and I don't think that one company or employee group is going to demand that the other be "stapled" or be required to undergo preferential interviews. They don't really follow a seniority system and by that I mean if anyone gets hosed it's management not the rank and file.


ATA's and Airtran's offer of preferential interviews for employment, which include Chicago Express RJ's is pretty **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** insulting. Ok I agree with that somewhat. On the one hand Airtran only offered to buy gates not a/c not assets only gates so really why should employees come along in that??? Now for the Chicago ex deal That's just plain Bulls hit so I am with you 200% in that!!!!!!

AWA and SWA offers are not public at this time and are therefore not germane to this discussion. There are pilots at ATA that have forgotten more things than you know about flying. There is a wealth of experience and knowledge that is NOT being respected in this deal. QUOTE] Now it's that attitude right there that gets under the skin it reeks of I AM OWED SOMETHING!!!

No matter what happens everyone will not be happy but I guess we all will just have to live with it...

WD.

 

[HalinTexas]

Ty,
Here's the deal....

ATA crews are part of a wet-lease for Airtran while Airtran spools up its MDW ops. ATA will be making money for Airtran, or at least maintaining market share, while Airtran pilots are hired and upgraded. (You're welcome.) Then, ATA crews are offered preferential interviews if they're Chicago based. I doubt many will be hired as they possibly would be disruptive to the company, since they don't really want to be there.

ATA crews are sacrificing their careers for Airtran pilots to advance theirs.'

If this deal goes through, which I doubt, then I won't be going to work for Airtran, and that's the feeling of many, if not most, ATA crewmembers. I feel I would be treated as second class by those that feel I should "feel lucky to be there." I'd rather learn to weld.

 

[HalinTexas]

>>"AWA and SWA offers are not public at this time and are therefore not germane to this discussion. There are pilots at ATA that have forgotten more things than you know about flying. There is a wealth of experience and knowledge that is NOT being respected in this deal. QUOTE] Now it's that attitude right there that gets under the skin it reeks of I AM OWED SOMETHING!!" "<<

If you would have met some of the people that I've met, you'd think the same thing. That includes some of the arrogant a__holes! My L10 training as a newhire was pretty enlightening.

The only thing I'm owed is respect. This deal, and you Whiskey, don't offer it. On a similar note, I have the utmost respect for those guys/gals at NA, Omni, and World (and others), the are busting their arsses doing what they do. ATA has been there and continues to do it. I think the AWA guys/gals are not given enough credit for sticking it out over there. I know they wanted our (ATA) contract and couldn't get it. They've earned it. I respect all those guys/gals flying around in crappy turboprops for the commuters I remember where I came from (TSA and Jetstreams), and that's where I really learned my "chops," and suffered the ultimate indignities.

The only true solution to this is a national seniority list, but neither airline management nor unions want it. It will take away their power.

 

[xanderman]

There are pilots at ATA that have forgotten more things than you know about flying. There is a wealth of experience and knowledge that is NOT being respected in this deal.

Just how, exactly, does your experience and knowledge determine where you should be placed on a seniority list? And if it's respect you want then don't talk down to us. The "Son your gonna have to learn a few things before you can swing gear for me" crap will not fill this pilot group with love for our ATA friends.

Ya know it's really interesting to think about how the discussions would go if it were AWA in dire straights and ATA was a potential purchaser of our company.

Could I then say things like "I expect more than a staple."

Or, "There are pilots at AWA that have forgotten more about flying than you know."

 

[HalinTexas]

>>"Just how, exactly, does your experience and knowledge determine where you should be placed on a seniority list? And if it's respect you want then don't talk down to us. The "Son your gonna have to learn a few things before you can swing gear for me" crap will not fill this pilot group with love for our ATA friends.

Ya know it's really interesting to think about how the discussions would go if it were AWA in dire straights and ATA was a potential purchaser of our company.

Could I then say things like "I expect more than a staple."

Or, "There are pilots at AWA that have forgotten more about flying than you know."<<


Knowledge and experience alone don't determine it, but it shouldn't be disregarded as it is in this case. I just turned 39, upgraded at 37 with 4 years 9 months at ATA. I'm the first to acknowledge how lucky I am. The only reason you assume I'm talking down to you is that I've been following this discussion on this board for a while now, have looked at the "offers" from management and Airtran, and have concluded that management from both companies, and many Airtran pilots look down on the ATA crewmembers. How am I supposed to react? We've hired a lot of USAir and TWA guys in the last couple of years. Without a doubt, I'm little embarrassed some are pulling gear for me for first year pay. They've done nothing wrong, spent a large part of their adult lives at one carrier and get screwed by unions and managment alike, as well as by 9-11 and the economy.

In January 2003 ALPA-ATA imposed a $500 per pilot merger assessment for legal representation. It's around $250K right now. The discussion on our "bitch" board was what would we do if we were the larger carrier. I can honestly say that we would follow ALPA's policy, at least with other ALPA carriers. I personally would fight for job/postion/domicile/pay protection for anyone we merged with. I would give up any integration fight for the above conditions. Meaning, non-ALPA carriers would get stapled with the above conditions. The devil is in the details, but I think I can assume most of the ATA list would agree to these terms.
Answer me this.....What did Valujet do with the old Airtran and old AirFL guys/gals they absorbed? How were they integrated? I guess you feel that the AMR/TWA deal was fair?

 

[On Your Six]

Any idea on what kind of RJs ATA Connection would fly? You'd think something like the E170 would be appealing at the moment with MDA freezing their order - or are those too big for the ATA Connection operation? Good news for the Saab drivers...

 

[Pickle]

Hal, you are about half off on your merger fund amount. I believe that it is more along the lines of $500k, not 250.

 

[HalinTexas]

>>"Any idea on what kind of RJs ATA Connection would fly? You'd think something like the E170 would be appealing at the moment with MDA freezing their order - or are those too big for the ATA Connection operation? Good news for the Saab drivers..."<<

A little past history. ATA was supposed to get some B767's last year, then 6-10 B757's this year, and with our concessions this summer, we were to get a bunch of 100 seaters. Where are they now?

Also, I believe that Chico was supposed to get RJ's if they didn't vote in ALPA last year. Where are they? They won't even buy them Saab 2000's.

I wouldn't count on ATA buying anything.