Turtle21
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Posts
- 1,683
.. I hope the new judge completely rules on the while deal, and puts the USAPA krap to rest. ..
To rest... to rest... seniority to rest.. LOL! that was funny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.. I hope the new judge completely rules on the while deal, and puts the USAPA krap to rest. ..
Perhaps if you had any actual knowledge of the facts at the time you wouldn't be so quick to blame anybody.
Nic. knew exactly what he was doing, and the two other neutrals were in full agreement with his decision. On balance, the nic award is completely equitable to all involved.
A Federal Court is about to underscore that point.
The Addington case is going to remove any ability for USAPA to hide behind some procedural loophole that was never intended to be used as such.
Both ALPA Merger Policy and the Transition Agreement bar management from using an integrated list until there is a single collective bargaining agreement for the new merged airline. Your management, both MECs, the pilot groups, and ALPA’s president still need to get an agreement completed before the seniority list can be implemented.
http://www.alpa.org/DesktopModules/...ew.aspx?itemid=12737&ModuleId=13049&Tabid=251
It's much more than a 'loop hole'
Guys don't be so quick to assume a jury will rule in your favor.
Behind every door stands a potential surprise.
Be prepared for both directions on the ruling.
We'll see. A Federal Judge has very wide latitude and he absolutely get's usapas willingness to delay and evade. He made it clear that it will all come to an end at the conclusion of the trial. We'll see.
Both ALPA Merger Policy and the Transition Agreement bar management from using an integrated list until there is a single collective bargaining agreement for the new merged airline. Your management, both MECs, the pilot groups, and ALPA’s president still need to get an agreement completed before the seniority list can be implemented.
http://www.alpa.org/DesktopModules/...ew.aspx?itemid=12737&ModuleId=13049&Tabid=251
It's much more than a 'loop hole'
For future mergers, no, for the previous one, yes. It's really simple: the East is trying to change the merger policy to benefit them over the West. That's a clear DFR case no matter how you feel about the Nicolau Award.Since ALPA no longer represents the pilots, are they still bound by ALPA merger policy?
Yes.So they will still have to have a joint contract for the list to be merged?
If we win the DFR case the judge will issue some kind of injuction. What it could be and what its effect would be is unknown. Of course they'll appeal but he seems to have a very good understanding of what's at stake so there's a good chance he'd make it very painful for the East to continue on their unvirtuous path. Their delay tactics of the past 22 months have benefitted them greatly already in terms of upgrades and fewer furloughs and the judge knows this. We can only hope justice will prevail.If that is the case, then the East really will just vote no all the time. Or can the judge force this?
He is a judge not an emperor.