Skywest Inc. isn't going to let this stuff slide away without a fight. The flying IS going to another carrier, so why not us? My philosophy is that a kick @$$ offense is your best defense. I'm sure Inc's view on the matter is the same way. The only thing I am unsure of is the quantity of aircraft flown.
We won't be understaffed because the flying is going to start with a few initial airframes and DAL isn't going to put up a fight when they are trying to cut capacity, and are foaming at the mouth to take seats off the market. There will be no staffing overlap durring the transfer.
I'm thinking the base is going to be a mix of the extremely senior, and extremely junior, with no "in between". However, I'd be willing to think that a large number of the ABA club will fill the ranks (anywhere but Atlanta).
As for this being bait for PBS- not this time. The announcement will come far ahead of the vote for PBS. We're looking at a couple of months tops for the UAL flying, and about four months minimum for the PBS language finalization, implimentation, and voting results. The timeline doesn't add up for this "bait and switch".
As I've said earlier, this is just a move to prevent further errosion from our company- not growth. We're merely keeping what we've got- surely not bad given this economy and time in the industry. Especially when so many other companys are retrenching. Any further growth will come through the cancellation or failed renewal of RepubliShuttle with DAL/UAL. Word I'm catching is their bid to "Go it alone" is angering their contractual partners. How long do you think UAL will fund competition in their Denver hub????? This certainly explains ASA's intrest in aquiring more 50's and some 700's/900's.
Our quickest way to get the furloughs back, and to take care of our own, is to make this work. If we go into IAD and handle it as well as we do Atlanta- we're going to be alright. Not to blow things out of proportion here, but I'm sure we can agree that we make Atlanta work as smooth as it does- we're capable of the same in Dulles. As long as we control what we can control, and do it well, we're going to be in the drivers seat for more options down the road- 20 airframes isn't going to produce the revenue we need on the United side- more airframes make the "juice worth the squeeze".