PHXFLYR
USAir by default
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2003
- Posts
- 2,177
Ed,
The main arguments for the outstanding questions you have are that...
1) The 1987 and 2003 hires remain at their same relative positions on the list before and after the merger. The real unfortunate part is a guy who was hired 20 yrs ago and never furloughed was only a junior FO out East before the merger. I definitely empathize with that being a $hitty situation, but ALPA merger policy is not DOH or LOS, it's relative seniority - that's why it ended up the way it did.
2) RE the attrition issue - the West argument on that is, pre-merger US Airways was headed for liquidation and no less. They were a shinking and arguably a dying airline, so the grand expectations of attrition that are touted here were re-born after the merger. The whole goal is to maintain or improve pre-merger expectations.
Again, I personally empathize with the fact that things are better now and the East might feel like they are being boxed out of something they brought to the table...but empathy doesn't shadow the reality, though, which is that things have improved out East as a result of the merger...this is why the arbitrator put the list together as he did.
Another important note is that the West has been almost entirely reasonable with our proposals for a relative seniority integration - beyond initial rumblings, we never called for a staple or demanded anything unworkable or unfair. On the other hand, the East has been hardline from the beginning with their DOH expectations and even when flat out told by the arbitrator that it would not go that way, did not waiver from that position - a position that would have furloughed pilots slotted above active pilots for years to come and effectively stapled the majority of our pilot group to the bottom of the list. We're not sure if it was arrogance or stupidity that allowed a sincere belief that DOH was a reasonable proposal, but the result should not be surprising.
The time has passed for being reasonable, though. All the proposals regarding fences, base protections, capturing East growth vs. West growth, etc. are moot...the opportunity to present those ideas was before we went into binding arbitration. They had many chances to negotiate and/or propose what is now touted as a "realistic solution" to the problem PRIOR to agreeing to BINDING arbitration. IMO the East should be livid with their leadership for expecting and selling an unworkable solution to the integration.
The list will stand, but the real problem now is that a mutual unwillingness to work together will delay indefinitely a contract that both sides have earned and deserve.
Thanks for flying the "new" US Airways.
Very nice re-cap. The really sad part in all of this is that the AAA Merger Comittee couldn't have found a group of pilots more willing to hammer something out at the table without the need for mediation or binding arbitration than their counterparts at AWA. It's really unfortunate they refused to back away from their DOH stance. Maybe things would have been more to their liking if they had.Now we will never know.
PHXFLYR
Last edited: