Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Thanks SkyWest for being a team player! Pay your own fuel next time...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
General,

Find a new sport! The day frequency is reduced as you describe it, is the beginning of the journey to your next bankruptcy. Thank goodness airlines are not run by pilots or the fortune teller pundits that call themselves airline analysts. Take a deep breath, take your medicine, and find something to do better with your time. How many hours did you waste writing 10,000 posts? How many of your predictions have come true? Are you really a pilot?

So far, none of Boyd's predictions have come true. The only thing that is happening, is that in a buyer's market and a trend to reduce capacity, your company is renegotiating lease payments on all their planes--rjs, md88's, and 737's. The lessors have no choice. Yes, there has been some adjustments in the rj fleets also--but elimination will never happen.

Hub networks have to have more feed and frequency, not less. High aircraft utilization is another element that improves hub networks. Higher frequency, during peak demand seasons, accomplished by increasing aircraft utilization, allows your company to capture additional traffic without increasing the size of the fleet. In slower demand seasons, frequency on a daily basis is adjusted by using future booking stats and balancing supply with demand by parking planes, reallocating flying to smaller planes, and reducing costs. This concept was introduced by Whitehurst and Bastian and has proved to be much more financially efficient.

The smallest plane in your fleet will always be an rj and not an MD88 or MD90. High fuel costs have an inflationary affect on your customers including the business traveler and your pleasure travelers--it's not the cost of the ticket, but the increased costs of everything consumed which reduces discretionary income. This will affect demand. When demand goes down, rjs will replace those larger planes that cannot break even as load factors drop. MD88's will replace 757's, and 757's will replace 767's--downsizing capacity to match demand.

BaBye!
 
Last edited:
How do we reduce frequency without leaving a market? We put a mainline plane in there twice a day, and take out 5 RJs. We squeeze everyone on two flights

Need to check your math there General. Five RJ's would be 250 seats. How many on an MD? 150? So two of your mainline flights would be a net increase of about 50 seats or so. No need to squeeze anyone on at all or do you cut it to one mainline flight a day?

Pull just one RJ and you reduce capacity by 20%. What do you really think your marketing people are going to do?

And what? Go out and SPEND MONEY to buy 100 used MD's to reduce capacity. Good thing you're not running the show at Delta.

Majors will permanantly sell bigger RJ's to management to outsource for a one time bargaining credit cookie and then wonder where their jobs went.


There goes your upgrade.
 
General, I don't know who writes these reports. But I'll tell you- except for an occasional off day, I'm flying maxed out seats in my little RJ.

I do my best to conserve fuel. Not to protect your cushy little job, I do it because I don't like 3 dollars a gallon at the pump.

SKW flying is down a little in SLC. This is only because Mother Delta gave some to Expressjet. Funny how your beloved company can't pay it's bill to SKW, but can give more flying to a more expensive feeder. Actions like this are usually indicative of financial hardships on the horizon- so you better hope your little "merger" happens to bail you out once again.

Don't think the NWA guys are just going to roll over so your life stays good.I'll make a prediction that if this merger goes through, you'll be griping about some part of it within 6 mos.
 
re: skywest causing Delta a loss

I have to agree with the above posters......Its not the Skywest pilots' fault that Delta's inept management made a deal promising to pay for their fuel (its not even Skywest management's fault). Kudos to them for making a good deal like that. Heck, if someone offered to pay for the gas in my car, I wouldn't turn them down while contracted to haul people around. Its the course of doing business. Shame on Delta's management for making such a rediculous deal!
Now about those 90 seat payrates skywest pilots.......:pimp:

737
 
Anyone who thinks that a regional should pay their own fuel bill just doesn't get it.

In theory each regional flight is made up of fixed costs + fuel. The major partner knows how much each seat will cost them. They need to charge enough to cover that plus profit. If they don't do that, then it is their fault not the regional, which has no control over pricing and scheduling.

But then again, airlines forgot long ago how to make a profit.
 
Phew. Good thing DL hung on to all those fuel sipping MD's.
 
Phew. Good thing DL hung on to all those fuel sipping MD's.

I give the entire DC-9 fleet 6 months post merger to be parked. Unless all of Delta's fuel savings rhetoric was nothing but BS. :rolleyes:
 
I give the entire DC-9 fleet 6 months post merger to be parked. Unless all of Delta's fuel savings rhetoric was nothing but BS. :rolleyes:

NWA will get rid of all 9's immediately. Then Delta will buy them for 9 million each (with engines). Think about it. The new Delta/NWA will already know how to work on them, and they will already have the sims. Its a done deal.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom