ACT700
What's it doing now?
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2004
- Posts
- 280
DirkkDiggler said:I've never understood people who can't comprehend the idea of jumpseating on an airline they don't like. Say you are commuting to and from Chicago for 5 years. Every day you've flown on an Air Wisconsin flight because that is who United has contracted with to fly that route. Then all of a sudden, United cancels the contract and sells it to GJ's. You still need to get home and to work every week. Are you really suggesting that these guys avoid jumpseating on GJ's just because they don't like them. The way I see it, they'd only be hurting themselves and their families. How does GJ's or any other airline profit financially from carrying jumpseaters? What financial (or otherwise) punishement is it to GJ's if we all stop jumpseating on them? This is probably the dumbest argument I've ever heard (the one about jumpseating on GJ's) You do what you've got to do to get to work and get home. It's not the same as going to work for them!
No, I suggest that people quit whining and badmouthing each other ('s airlines).
The way I see it, all regional airlines are in the same position. They all pay sub-par wages, for F/Os at least, and you guys crying about GJ being worse than Mesaba, or Mesa, or whatever regional airline name you'd like to fill in, isn't solving the problem at all.
So-quit setting a double standard.
Because I'm pretty sure the guys working at GJ, for whatever reason that maybe, needs to make a living, too-just like the guys trying to jumpseat home needs to do it for financial reasons.
I for one, think that if ALPA would have fought to bring mainline and regional pilots together, would have been a step in the right direction.
Instead, ALPA did management a favour by pitting the two pilot groups against each other.