waveflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Posts
- 10,005
8v8tr-
I think you see the complication- your group is much younger. If you got relative or DOH- in 10 years you would dominate the list and be senior to our older group for the rest of our careers. is it "fair" for a swa hire who was on pace to retire at 100, be pushed down and retire at a paltry #800-900, bc swa bought you? In many cases that's what happens with DOH. And relative's worse.
It's tough, the sane and non-narcissistic among us know that it might be tough on you guys short term- but we feel the money and better mgmt and bases and growth potential can make up for it, vs spending the next 30 years junior to you, in order to make the next 10 more "fair" to you.
You said this SLI was equitable, but not fair. I'm not sure "fair" exists anywhere- but equitable can be measured- as has been oft repeated- AT will be getting huge money, something most pilots give up seniority& QOL to get when they upgrade. (How many on your list chose to stay FOs for the seniority?) - so $$ is valuable, and AT cannot be the only one's to benefit.
As for the "contracts are temporary"- "seniority is forever" - let's look at reality- 9/11. Was 9/11 the sole cause of all the bad things that happened? Bc swa grew enormously after 9/11 bc their balance sheet was better. UAL, AA, AAA, well- everyone also had limited time to use the event to file BK and gut union contracts. Now look at usair, since everyone likes to compare that (irrationally)- their balance sheet was terribly weak, they furloughed thousands and then got bought by Amer West. Those furloughed pilots were then stapled. How was seniority forever there? How was seniority forever at pan am- or at eastern?
Bottom line - the company's bottom line matters more than the temporary value of the pilot contract. So does the relationship with the union and mgmt. Regardless of what the militant say- we have a very good relationship w/ mgmt. We do not, and aren't going to get paid an unsustainable amount.
So there is a risk that our contract could go south- but if you look at our company's bottom line, all those arguments are just not likely. We are financially the strongest airline in history. Let that sink in. (and remember how long it took airlines to fail who weren't 10% as strong as us) A whole lot would have to change and change fast for you to have a bad career. And you have to weigh the chances of that happening vs this deal.
I think you see the complication- your group is much younger. If you got relative or DOH- in 10 years you would dominate the list and be senior to our older group for the rest of our careers. is it "fair" for a swa hire who was on pace to retire at 100, be pushed down and retire at a paltry #800-900, bc swa bought you? In many cases that's what happens with DOH. And relative's worse.
It's tough, the sane and non-narcissistic among us know that it might be tough on you guys short term- but we feel the money and better mgmt and bases and growth potential can make up for it, vs spending the next 30 years junior to you, in order to make the next 10 more "fair" to you.
You said this SLI was equitable, but not fair. I'm not sure "fair" exists anywhere- but equitable can be measured- as has been oft repeated- AT will be getting huge money, something most pilots give up seniority& QOL to get when they upgrade. (How many on your list chose to stay FOs for the seniority?) - so $$ is valuable, and AT cannot be the only one's to benefit.
As for the "contracts are temporary"- "seniority is forever" - let's look at reality- 9/11. Was 9/11 the sole cause of all the bad things that happened? Bc swa grew enormously after 9/11 bc their balance sheet was better. UAL, AA, AAA, well- everyone also had limited time to use the event to file BK and gut union contracts. Now look at usair, since everyone likes to compare that (irrationally)- their balance sheet was terribly weak, they furloughed thousands and then got bought by Amer West. Those furloughed pilots were then stapled. How was seniority forever there? How was seniority forever at pan am- or at eastern?
Bottom line - the company's bottom line matters more than the temporary value of the pilot contract. So does the relationship with the union and mgmt. Regardless of what the militant say- we have a very good relationship w/ mgmt. We do not, and aren't going to get paid an unsustainable amount.
So there is a risk that our contract could go south- but if you look at our company's bottom line, all those arguments are just not likely. We are financially the strongest airline in history. Let that sink in. (and remember how long it took airlines to fail who weren't 10% as strong as us) A whole lot would have to change and change fast for you to have a bad career. And you have to weigh the chances of that happening vs this deal.