SWA yes vote:

[Ty Webb]

You can never admit that you "stole" this from someone else. I did this to get under your hide because of how you were acting back then. It looks like you are trying to be more civilized but too late. Your true character is well known.

If I "stole it", it was from a dead painter, named Salvador Dali.

You copied it from me because you were frustrated by your inability to frame a logical response. I guess some things never change. :laugh:

 

[Flycatcher99]

SWA has already agreed in the Process Agreement that they WILL merge the operations. Read it again.

Absolutely incorrect. Both you and Ty need to reread it yourselves. The agreement begins with the introduction that the agreement entails the process whereby the two carriers will be merged into one carrier should that happen. Nowhere does it stipulate that the two carriers will be merged. Do you understand the difference?

Please quote the portion of the process agreement that stipulates that integration take place.

 

[PCL_128]

Please quote the portion of the process agreement that stipulates that integration take place.

Section VI.a. It's not ambiguous. Sorry.

 

[Flycatcher99]

"WHEREAS,​

​

​

the McCaskill-Bond Act provides that in the event of a transaction between air carriers in which one air carrier acquires fifty (50) percent or more of the stock of another air carrier in a transaction for the combination of multiple air carriers into a single air carrier, the seniority lists of the employees of the air carriers shall be integrated pursuant to the provisions set out in Sections 3 and 13 of the CAB’s decision in​

Allegheny-Mohawk, 59 CAB 22 (1972);"



If SWA does not complet a "combination of multiple air carriers into a single air carrier", then the above paragraph, and, thus, the process agreement, is neither here nor there. All the process agreement does is provide the "process" that has been "agreed" upon by all carriers to complete the SLI if the two carriers become one.

Thus endeth the reading comprehension lesson.

 

[vetrider]

SWA has already agreed in the Process Agreement that they WILL merge the operations. Read it again.

That still doesn't mean squat. The SWA guys won't even need Prater to help try to tie Air Tran pilots' hands behind their back. If the SWA guys feel the need, they can and I bet they will make the Airways east pilots look like complete rookies.

 

[RLAblows]

I'll vote yes if you can get me a Hope Solo poster.

 

[greenpilot]

If you believe that the merger of aai and swa depends on the SLI of the different employee groups why is swa currently spending millions of dollars integrating the two airlines?
As far a the other groups of employees it doesn't seem to hurt delta having to seperate FA groups.

 

[luv2fly]

Section VI.a. It's not ambiguous. Sorry.

Man, you are wrong again. That section only applies if Complete Operational Merger occurs.

I guess you didn't keep reading the document.

Section VII. Termination of Agreement
(a)...
(b) Any Party may terminate this agreement by fifteen (15) days written notice delivered to all other Parties at any time following termination of the Merger Agreement....

Meaning no Process Agreement without Complete Operational Merger!

 

[RLAblows]

That still doesn't mean squat. The SWA guys won't even need Prater to help try to tie Air Tran pilots' hands behind their back. If the SWA guys feel the need, they can and I bet they will make the Airways east pilots look like complete rookies.

Who's Prater?

 

[PCL_128]

Man, you are wrong again. That section only applies if Complete Operational Merger occurs.

I guess you didn't keep reading the document.

Section VII. Termination of Agreement
(a)...
(b) Any Party may terminate this agreement by fifteen (15) days written notice delivered to all other Parties at any time following termination of the Merger Agreement....

Meaning no Process Agreement without Complete Operational Merger!

You should really talk to a lawyer. You could use some help in interpreting these things.