Blah, Blah, Blah . . .
I disagree with you on pretty much every of your points, but it's not worth the time to debate you on it.
So, have a nice life, buddy. I know I will.
I don't instigate anything. You trying to paint me into that corner isn't going to work.
Only in your eyes and maybe 2 or 3 other people on here. The simple truth is that you don't like anyone who doesn't "rah rah" about Southwest. That's fine, you don't have to like me. But the simple fact that others don't see the same thing you do in my posts should be your big sign... you know, the sign that says maybe you need to re-think your "label"?
I pretty much don't care whether you think so or not (or much of anyone else on here), I just have no interest in seeing history re-written to something it was not. No, they're simply being non-confrontational in their job setting because they're professionals."We", are mostly on this board. All the others I have met on line both pilots and flight attendants seem very happy. Specifically stating how great SWA treats their employees compared to how AT did.
I know, I know, they are are lying because they are afraid.
I don't instigate anything. You trying to paint me into that corner isn't going to work.
Only in your eyes and maybe 2 or 3 other people on here. The simple truth is that you don't like anyone who doesn't "rah rah" about Southwest. That's fine, you don't have to like me. But the simple fact that others don't see the same thing you do in my posts should be your big sign... you know, the sign that says maybe you need to re-think your "label"?
Just a thought.
No, they're simply being non-confrontational in their job setting because they're professionals.
Professionals don't stir the pot like you do. But thanks for your input! So glad you're here... (that's passive-aggressive again in case you still don't understand the definition).
I don't instigate anything. You trying to paint me into that corner isn't going to work.
Only in your eyes and maybe 2 or 3 other people on here. The simple truth is that you don't like anyone who doesn't "rah rah" about Southwest. That's fine, you don't have to like me. But the simple fact that others don't see the same thing you do in my posts should be your big sign... you know, the sign that says maybe you need to re-think your "label"?
Just a thought.
No, they're simply being non-confrontational in their job setting because they're professionals.
Professionals don't stir the pot like you do. But thanks for your input! So glad you're here... (that's passive-aggressive again in case you still don't understand the definition).
Yes, you are. I'm talking in generalities and not blaming you or the pilots of SWA for anything at all and you got personal.
No, I pretty much put it right out there. There wasn't any "hiding" it at all. The grin was because I think you're a putz.Hide an insult with a grin.......
Ditto. You can't debate facts, constantly make things personal, and everyone knows it. Not worried about it in the slightest. If my "reputation" is that I believe our pilots should have been treated better in this process and that GK should have honored the Process Agreement, stayed out of it, and let it go to arbitration then integration as he promised in the Process Agreement, I'm good with that.
As was his post. I don't respond personally unless someone attacks me personally first. You'll find I do the same in person.
As are you. Inferring that I should just take his personal attacks and not respond, and making a cheap shot yourself in the same post. I'll give you an example in your last post:
You accuse me of being arrogant, your own cheap shot at me, then you berate me for taking "cheap shots"...
Yes, you are. I'm talking in generalities and not blaming you or the pilots of SWA for anything at all and you got personal.
No, I pretty much put it right out there. There wasn't any "hiding" it at all. The grin was because I think you're a putz.
Ditto. You can't debate facts, constantly make things personal, and everyone knows it. Not worried about it in the slightest. If my "reputation" is that I believe our pilots should have been treated better in this process and that GK should have honored the Process Agreement, stayed out of it, and let it go to arbitration then integration as he promised in the Process Agreement, I'm good with that.
I've said as much to senior SWA management. I don't call anyone names. I don't get angry about it. But I also have ZERO tolerance for bullsh*t, yours included, and call things like I see them. If that's earned me a reputation... I'm good with that.
Like Winston Churchill said: "So you've made enemies? Good! That means you've stood up for something at least once in your life."
As was his post. I don't respond personally unless someone attacks me personally first. You'll find I do the same in person.
As are you. Inferring that I should just take his personal attacks and not respond, and making a cheap shot yourself in the same post. I'll give you an example in your last post:
You accuse me of being arrogant, your own cheap shot at me, then you berate me for taking "cheap shots"...
Pot paging Kettle... come in, Kettle.
The sheer ARROGANCE of people like you thinking that "ALL" the AirTran pilots (or even the majority of them) are just peachy happy with the way things happened is simply asinine. I mean you guys REALLY need to get over your own ego.
Will people move on and make the best of it? Sure. Do you REALLY think they're HAPPY with the way this worked out?
You're going to need a reasonable suspicion test. Seriously. Lay off the wacky weed.
If you say so. I had started letting everything go when Max came out of lurking from his wife's-imposed posting hiatus and started in. Go back and read the last few posts of mine before he posted.
LOL - if you say so. My fiance' is a practicing Psychiatrist... if I had "manic" behavior, I'm pretty sure she'd have noticed it a long time ago. Just celebrated our 2nd year since we met, she's had time to figure it out... IF it were there. Opinions vary, I guess.
No, no judgment. You are entitled to your opinion, even if I don't agree with you. I'd PREFER if people would limit their opinion TO THE ISSUES, rather than get personal (like you also have done now), but hey... with the Webmaster letting this board be a free-for-all these days, why try to keep discussions on-topic?
And that lets me know that you're a SWA employee. It's only perceived as "SWA hate" by SWA employees. Everyone else pretty much recognizes it as the angst accompanying a widely-unpopular SLI integration result, with people spewing angst on BOTH sides of the aisle...
