satpak77
Marriott Platinum Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2003
- Posts
- 3,015
He's back flying.
Good for him !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's back flying.
BAC still needs to be met for a DUI conviction.
BAC still needs to be met for a DUI conviction.
I'm not sure about that. I think those that have refused the test (which you can do) will come out at the end of the day with an alcohol related driving conviction.
What else would you expect from a cowboy group like the southwest group. Just look at some of the behavior from these clowns.:smash:I'm sure his peers are treating him like a hero.
I'm not sure about that. I think those that have refused the test (which you can do) will come out at the end of the day with an alcohol related driving conviction.
For a DUI/DWI conviction, BAC must be proven.
What if I am drunk with a chick in the back seat and her pants are off with the keys in the pocket? And some Jacka$$ cop with nothing better to do starts flashing his light on her and tapping on the window. Oh yeah, that's right, he was cool and told us to "get a room." Ahhh memories........
That's not true.
DUI is driving under the influence. All that is necessary is to prove that the driver was impaired. Any evidence of impairment can be presented, it doesn't have to be BAC results. One common form of evidence is the police car dashboard camera video of obvious impaired behavior during the traffic stop.
When BAC tests became available for enforcement most states added a second offense, called a per se offense, which does not require any evidence of actual impairment to prove. All that is needed is a BAC test result in excess of the state's legal limit.
A defendant can be convicted of both offenses, DUI and the per se offense, but will only receive one sentence.