Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA Fires a Newhire?!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
What do you boys need a refresher? Its all ball-bearings these days.
-I.M. Fletcher

gotta agree a little bit with both posts. A little bit country and a little bit rock and roll. But typically the transition from tactical flying to 737 type flying is fairly seamless for guys who are current and proficient.
 
Last edited:
Aubie said:
It's pretty piss-poor that when someone writes a post about a rumor that a SWA new-hire gets canned somehow an assumption is made that it's a prior military guy, and suddenly everyone of you guys with chips on your shoulders starts taking cheap shots at military pilots. (Or to mention another recent post, when a military instructor-type just posts an innocent question about SWA calling T-34 guys some jacknutz fires off and advises military guys need to "pay their dues.")

Fellas, that's pretty pathetic and unprofessional. I have flown single seat and multipiloted aircraft in the navy for 10 years now and if I were to start making petty and unprofessional generalizations, it would be about the small number of GA and commercial guys I ran into at FBO's that had gigantic chips on their shoulders and thought it appropriate to give me unsolicited criticism of everything military. But I don't - the commercial guys I have had the privilege of getting to know through my type rating and interviewing at SWA were all truly outstanding guys and I'm a better pilot and person for knowing them. Those were all the kind of guys that would make great pilots at SWA - professional aviators with great attitudes - NOT guys that peruse posts looking for their chance to fire off at guys who got their flying experience through a different avenue than their own. I could go off on a tangent and detail the quality and difficulty of military training and a military flying career but I won't - that's NOT the purpose of this forum. And it's pretty pathetic that anyone from any background should have to defend himself here anyhow.

To the 99.9% of civilian guys whose time I have wasted with my ranting - I apologize. You guys are awesome. To you guys in the extreme but vocal minority who for some reason harbor resentments or jealosies towards military pilots - GET OVER IT. Petty attitudes like that will surface when you interview and the only one who gets screwed is you. Great companies like SWA aren't looking for guys with deep-seated prejudices.

And the next time someone suggests we military guys "pay our dues" - call me and tell me that when you've brought aboard a 50K lb airplane with one engine out aboard the only airport within 3K miles and it's pitching back and forth in seas so rough you can see the screws coming up out of the water.


UPHILL BOTH WAYS IN 17FT. OF SNOW TOO!!!


:rolleyes:
 
One of the finest captains that I've flown with was from the Military. He is on furlough from USAir and is flying with us under the J4J agreement. On the other hand I've had great experiences from our civilian captains. I agree with everyone that attitude is everything.........C'mon who wants to spend 4 days with an uptight A$$hole!
 
"Paying dues" usually means working long hours for crappy pay, paying your owwn way through flight school while working a part-time job, etc.

Paying dues has nothing to do with the degree of difficulty of the previous job. Nice attempt at the 'trump card" though.

Are you saying, then, that a military pilot that never landed on a carrier but spent most of his time flying from one really large airport to another doing something mundane like troop transport is less 'worthy' that you?

That seems to be what you are implying.
 
While i have no dog in this fight..

The bottom line is that the military guys as well as the civies tend to be as a group biased towards their fellow members..

I think a certain amount of that is normal..

Where it gets out of hand is..

1.When one un-informed member of the group bashes a member of the other side without the benefit of personal experiences or insight.

2.And then a member of the other side of the isle is stupid enough to respond to what is clearly a non-productive bit of flame bait..

In either case its a pointless pursuit..

When asked during training what aircraft you fly..

The answer better be what ever the company is paying you to fly..Nothing else matters at that point..

Mike
 
Aubie...

Don't fly angry.

The thing that gives you guys the bad stereotype is the 'I served and the world owes me something' attitude that unfortunately follows many of your comrades. That and the 'what could you possibly teach me' attitude that very often corresponds with it.

The point some of you miss is that 'paying your dues' is as biased as much by military guys as the civies. If some junior officer jumps the chain and get promoted over you and your squadronmates you would say he didn't pay his dues. Same thing for when a fighter type with zero 'real world' experience jumps in ahead of a guy that put in seven years flying commuters. Different dues boys. And not always transferrable, especially these days.

Remember guys, your prior experience is only what gets you in the door here. It's what you do here afterwards that really counts.

Pay your dues in the right seat. Keep up the learing curve and you'll do fine. Bring aboard a bunch of attitude and 'when I was at the pentagon' and you might end up like the guy that was let go. And rightfully so.

In the final analysis, as qualified as you think you are, there are thousands more out there just as qualified or moreso. So all things being equal, who gets hired and who gets fired? Easy to figure out.
 
Last edited:
Well said Mike....good to see you back, hope all is well. Gotta go do what we use to do a lot of...talk about SWA!!!! hope to hear from you soon,
 
Hey dude..

I hope all is well at your house..

Give me a call sometime and i will bring you up to speed..

Now go outside and play..Stop sitting in front of this stupid box..

Mike
 
After all that thrashing and trashing it still comes back to attitude.TC

(Of course SOME of us ARE a little better than others.... ;) KIDDING, I'm kidding...OK? :D )

P.S.--What's a "COD Pilot"? An F-14 guy said they were all gay. I didn't get it.
 
UPHILL BOTH WAYS IN 17FT. OF SNOW TOO!!!
LMAO! God knows ... I wish I was man enough to bring aboard a 50K lb airplane with one engine out aboard the only airport within 3K miles and it's pitching back and forth in seas so rough you can see the screws coming up out of the water while a trained monkey stabbed at my eyes with 6" hat pins and weasels ripped my flesh ... and uh .... blowing snow and all that ... :D

A couple posters here are a prime example of why military pilots are given a hard time about their attitudes by us civies. And I'm sure you both know who you are ... so I won't point it out. :rolleyes:

Really guys ... with all due respect ... get over yourselves just a little. We had a 58-year-old grandmother soloing in Skyhawks in 20 hours at one of the last FBOs I worked at. It ain't brain surgury.

Minh - Humble Ex-Grunt Trying To Fly For A Living
 
Last edited:
Allright crybabies, is it time for a group hug? I find this bickering back and forth dissapointing and it serves no purpose but to piss someone else off! Why don't we all act like adults and get back to discussing the stuff that matters for us aviators... seniority, sex and freeflowing beer (or beverage of choice).

Sloth
 
Last edited:
Snakum,

Look cowgirl, I don't care who you have seen 'solo' or with what.

All this whining about 'paying your dues'...etc. I don't care how crappy your life was prior to getting into a regional/major, whatever (NOT YOU IN PARTICULAR SNAKUM...PLS disregard). You and I are all a creature of our own choices. The fact of the matter is everyone is trying to say that theirs is the 'gold standard' by which all other aviators should be measured. This just isn't true. I guarantee you that I would have had no idea how to keep that DC-10 in Sioux City airborne...nor do I assume to think I would be good enough w/ 10 years of heavy line experience (from now) to do such.

Tactical military flying is not the end all be all...but I can tell you that it is demanding.
More demanding than the majority of civilian flying jobs out there. Landing on a ship at night...hundreds of times may not sound like paying 'your dues'....but I guaranDAMtee you that most of us would take the crappy pay, long hours....and nights on the beach over it...any day and twice on Sunday.

We all have our stories of woe...lets get over it and figure out how to get all of us decent flying jobs.
 
Last edited:
The guard and reserve guys that usually don't make it through pilot training are the ones with high time, poor attitudes and the feeling that their experience outside the military will carry them through.

The same can be said for the military guys transitioning to the civilian world.

It's all in the attitude.

I personally have been told by an ex F-15 type NEW HIRE (who I had just bought a few adult beverages for....), that he felt that civilians had no business at SWA, and proceeded to tell me what's what. I didn't bother to remind him that SWA is a civilian company...... I just laughed, then asked him if the F-15 was one of those green, army plane with 4 propellers ;) After describing to me the differences between air superiority fighters and targets, I then asked him if they called his plane the "Eagle", and if so, didn't he have to be homosexual to fly it? I thought he was gonna hit me........

In his defense, he had already had a few before I got down there, so he probably wasnt able to contain his attitude. He is still here, 5 years or so later, so I assume that he either kept the attitude in check, or someone handed him his a$$......

In almost 20 years of airline flying, I have flown with pilots of just about every backround. From 250 hour EEOC wonders to 15,000 hour numerous airline guys, to blue angels, thunderbirds, corporate guys, commuter pukes, cargo guys, fighter guys, colonels, astronauts etc etc etc etc.

No one group corners the market on jerks, nor are any devoid of them.........

FWIW, while I'll razz some of the military guys (especially the "retarded kernals" ;) ), some of my favorite guys to fly with (in both seats) have this pedigree, and conversely, some of the biggest jerks I've flown with have been pure civilians.

As a matter of fact, the 4 worst guys that I've ever flown with as an FO were civilians.

Attitude is everything........
 
Tripower455 said:
The same can be said for the military guys transitioning to the civilian world.

It's all in the attitude.

I personally have been told by an ex F-15 type NEW HIRE (who I had just bought a few adult beverages for....), that he felt that civilians had no business at SWA, and proceeded to tell me what's what. I didn't bother to remind him that SWA is a civilian company...... I just laughed, then asked him if the F-15 was one of those green, army plane with 4 propellers ;) After describing to me the differences between air superiority fighters and targets, I then asked him if they called his plane the "Eagle", and if so, didn't he have to be homosexual to fly it? I thought he was gonna hit me........

In his defense, he had already had a few before I got down there, so he probably wasnt able to contain his attitude. He is still here, 5 years or so later, so I assume that he either kept the attitude in check, or someone handed him his a$$......

In almost 20 years of airline flying, I have flown with pilots of just about every backround. From 250 hour EEOC wonders to 15,000 hour numerous airline guys, to blue angels, thunderbirds, corporate guys, commuter pukes, cargo guys, fighter guys, colonels, astronauts etc etc etc etc.

No one group corners the market on jerks, nor are any devoid of them.........

FWIW, while I'll razz some of the military guys (especially the "retarded kernals" ;) ), some of my favorite guys to fly with (in both seats) have this pedigree, and conversely, some of the biggest jerks I've flown with have been pure civilians.

As a matter of fact, the 4 worst guys that I've ever flown with as an FO were civilians.

Attitude is everything........

Wait a second, I think I know that guy! The ego bruise after the helo comment must've scarred him for life!

Nicely done and well said.
 
I'd like to see Mr. "civilians have no place in commercial aircraft" in an iced-up baron in northern michigan. Might decide that he is not the only one who has had an opportunity to develop a skill or two.
 
Dudes....not worth getting all worked up about. With regards to the F-15 driver. Hell the Eagle dudes I have flown with were either the greatest Americans on the planet or complete prima donna freak-shows. I can say that about this group I fly with now...although the bad dudes are 1 in 100.

There are a$$holes on both sides of the fence...no one corporation or body of professionals is immune to them. Unfortunately...

Lets all start our own airline of only cool guys/girls and everyone starts at $100 an hour/ the stewardesses are all under 35 and we only fly to the best cities in the world...(except for the pay I think I'm describing Virgin Atlantic).
 
my bad...

It seems like I tossed a grenade into a gasoline pool and reproved the old axiom "2 gin & tonics + internet access = stand by to put foot in pie-hole"

Seriously, though. I agree with 99% of all the comments posted and apologize if anyone got bent out of shape - I just have a strong distaste for prejudices of any sort. I think I speak for 99% of military guys when I say there really isn't any kind of derogatory or demeaning attitude towards civilian guys on our part. Never meant it like that - just don't like it the other way either. (If someone looks over some other recent threads he'll find some definite anti-military sentiment.) And like I said initially, some of the finest people and pilots I have met are guys from the regional and corporate world that I have got to know in the last year. If some old fighter guy says civilians have no place in a major, he is definitely not speaking for the majority. (But that's probably just his advisor, Jack Daniels, speaking for him.) The fact is, we are all on this site because we WANT to be civilians...

So, sorry if I ruffled some feathers and distracted everyone from the real purpose here - getting sweet gouge and advice from the likes of Obi-Chase Kenobi et al...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top