Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA culture!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Thats one reason why people choose a smaller carrier. Most just have the job they got- but for some it's an ego thing. When youre a big fish in a small pond, you can indulge those delusions of grandeur and none of your day to day experiences interfere with it.

It's why some stay on as a regional check airman even when they can earn more as a major FO. Ive even seen flight instructors who stay as that for that reason. Clear as day the motivation. They just can't go from being the guy giving the instruction to receiving it. Or just being a normal line pilot. For some it's not the actual benefits of being senior- it's the ego of saying 'look at me and my schedule. I'm senior. I'm important. They need that validation. For some, this is the issue driving the discontent and desire for aggressive bargaining- they don't want to be an average line fish in a really big lake.
Funny how that fear thing crops up again-
 
You could at least be gracious, and say "thank you" to our FO's who were planning to upgrade on those jets, or perhaps get off reserve. :laugh:

Since 2008, Southwest has had ZERO growth. What part of zero don't you understand? Who should I thank for that?

I guess it's true, Ty's pond just got a little bit bigger by the count of 6000 pilots. No wonder his pissed.
 
Hey Lear what does your Father think of this whole SWA/AT thing? What advice has he given you?
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but he just hopes the whole thing goes smoothly after watching what has happened with USAir/AWA (which he's disgusted with by the way). Binding arbitration should be... well... binding. Even if you don't like the outcome.
 
Did you read my entire post? We are not upgrading. We recalled a handful of captains. We hired just enough to drain the two year pool. We did those things because we are short now. Not later. NOW. How could that have anything to do with air tran? You say we have your delivery slots. Then why is SWA's fleet not increasing in size? You are aware we are retiring 300's, right?
Which SPECIFIC -300 hull numbers did you retire in the last 90 days while you took your most recent -700 deliveries which were coming here before the announcement?

Last I heard, the initial INTENT was to replace your -300's with the -700 delivery slots you had PRE-merger announcement, but that the additional deliveries you're getting won't accelerate the retirement of your -300's, meaning all the -700 slots you're getting of ours are growth slots.

If you have the hull numbers that have been sent to the desert since March, I'll stand corrected, but from what we've heard, none of your -300's have been parked since you took delivery of our -700's.
 
If you have the hull numbers that have been sent to the desert since March, I'll stand corrected, but from what we've heard, none of your -300's have been parked since you took delivery of our -700's.

We took delivery of OUR -700s.

Not sure what that has to do with anything, but he just hopes the whole thing goes smoothly after watching what has happened with USAir/AWA (which he's disgusted with by the way). Binding arbitration should be... well... binding. Even if you don't like the outcome.

So he is a Westie? I thought, he was East.
 
Last edited:
Not sure what that has to do with anything, but he just hopes the whole thing goes smoothly after watching what has happened with USAir/AWA (which he's disgusted with by the way). Binding arbitration should be... well... binding. Even if you don't like the outcome.

A reasoned man would see the flaw with your argument if the outcome of binding arbitration is flawed.
 
Get over yourself Ty.... it has to do with you, its about more vacation time.

When you fools go into training to become FOs, they are going to take 2 - 737s out of service a month so we can paint and make them look like SWA birds. They'll probably will still be ugly and have AT at the end of the tail number, there is no helping ugly.

:cartman:

"When you fools go to training...."

Wow. Really feeling the Luv now. Could you be any more condescending?
 
When I retire I'll be around number 100. If you put 400 guys above me, mostly younger than me , when I retire I'll be around number 500 instead of number 100. So, yes, I will be harmed. That's just me personally, compound that problem for the FO's. Sorry, DOH is a non-starter and Relative is dreamland.

Well if that is the consensus around there then we will see you in court. Just for curiosities sake, you laid out for us what we should not expect out of this would you be good enough to share with us your vision of what we can expect?
 
We took delivery of OUR -700s.
LOL - mkay... if that's the way you want to play it. ;)

So he is a Westie? I thought, he was East.
No, he's an Eastie. He just has a sense of honor and ethics.

You don't agree to binding arbitration unless you're willing to live with the outcome, even if you don't like it.
 
A reasoned man would see the flaw with your argument if the outcome of binding arbitration is flawed.
No, that's what someone with a poor sense of ethics does. Reason their way out of an agreement they don't like.

Part of what's wrong with this country, but I digress,,,
 

Latest resources

Back
Top