AA767AV8TOR
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Posts
- 258
tzskipper said:Maybe the solution lays in tying the manditory retirement age of pilots, to the minimum age required by the Federal Goverment to access Social Security and Medicare....
Skipper
Skipper,
I think the fairest solution if in fact this POS does pass, since we were all hired under the Age 60 rule, all those over age 60 should be put at the bottom of the seniority list. That way, no one receives a windfall at the expense of others.
Those seeking age 65 + want to keep their seats and seniority, all at the expense of the junior guys. They want their cake and eat it too. They want it under the pretense of “loving to fly” and “it’s age discrimination,” but don’t be fooled, it’s all about the money.
Follow the money trail. For those guys hanging on to their Captain seats – it’s another five years at $200,000 plus and not having to dip into their retirement savings, translation – the windfall could be over $1 million plus for them. All those junior will be impacted as retirements halt and the progression train slows. At slow/no growth carriers such as the legacies, the financial results will be especially devastating. Where’s the money coming from, you ask? Why the junior pilots of course.
I realize SWA is growing like a weed, but it may not always be like that in the future. All it takes is for fuel hedges to run out, an external event to occur, or a couple of crashes and/or incidents, throw in a few bad management decisions, and suddenly the quick progression to the left seat comes to a screeching halt. How do I know, I lived it.
This is bad legislation!
AA767AV8TOR
Last edited: