Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA - AAI question

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Aren't you on the transition team? Weren't you there?

No to both questions.

yes, and so your NC decides to quit talking and try to influence the transition agreement between SWAPA and SWA?

Why would you assume that our Merger Committee is trying to influence your transition agreement? I haven't seen anything that would indicate that at all.
 
Why would you assume that our Merger Committee is trying to influence your transition agreement? I haven't seen anything that would indicate that at all.

Cause you said:
Disagreement remains on the critical issue of completing an operational merger within a specified time.


That is a CBA issue.

As such, both sides agreed to defer further discussion


That isn't what our VP says.

In the meantime, we will work instead to arrange a meeting between SWAPA, ALPA, and the managements of AirTran and Southwest, with the goal of concluding work on a Process Agreement; reaching a common understanding of the merger process; and discussing Transition Agreements to protect the interests of AirTran and Southwest pilots during the period between the Date of Corporate Closing (DOCC) and an operational merger of the two carriers.

No offense, and it is really cool that you come on this site, but it really looks like you guys are trying to either modify our CBA or dictate to our management how to run the airline.
 
Last edited:
Whatever.

"Fair and equitable" is a two way street. That is hardly a partisan view. SWA pilots will be fine. We won't get anything like the windfall that the AAI pilots will get, but no ever said that life is fair.

On this we mostly agree. One other thing to keep in mind is that any contractual improvements that might be made by the AAI pilots do not come at the expense of the SWA pilots, the same can not be said of any relative improvements in system seniority some SWA pilots expect. That would come at the expense of the AAI pilots.
 
fd, you're right. swa pilots need not be scared. They bring too much to this acquisition and swa would be fools NOT to go to arbitration.

I don't think you need to be scared, but I think that many of you are.

You don't need to be, because in the end logic and fairness will prevail and it will have little to do with which group is bigger, but rather what the law and applicable contracts state. I know that many will not accept the ultimate outcome, but that is because seniority is such a personal issue that it clouds objectivity.
 
O keep in mind is that any contractual improvements that might be made by the AAI pilots do not come at the expense of the SWA pilots,

Sure they do. We are acquiring a company whose financials aren't nearly as strong as ours, a company that has furloughed, a company with a lot of debt and not much cash. SWA pilots are going to be a lot more exposed after the acquisition and money that could have been used for organic growth is providing for the career altering windfall at FL.
 
Sure they do. We are acquiring a company whose financials aren't nearly as strong as ours, a company that has furloughed, a company with a lot of debt and not much cash. SWA pilots are going to be a lot more exposed after the acquisition and money that could have been used for organic growth is providing for the career altering windfall at FL.

Geez, then why-o-why is SWA acquiring AAI? :rolleyes:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top