Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest Ties

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

waka

Emasculating the Right
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
1,972
Do SW pilots have to wear the flag tie? It seems like that's all I see lately.
 
waka said:
Do SW pilots have to wear the flag tie? It seems like that's all I see lately.

Does it bother you that a group of individuals choose to wear attire that reflects their love and support of their country?
 
Sniper Bob said:
Does it bother you that a group of individuals choose to wear attire that reflects their love and support of their country?
Yes, it's a disgusting and inappropriate gesture completely counter to the ideals of modern Americanism. How are we supposed to promote diversity and individuality in an environment where people unite for a common cause rather than fight one another over their differences? Solidarity is the enemy of progress!

Take off the Master's yoke from your neck! Don't unite, untie!

(I've been saving that line for a while now. This thread was tailor-made for it! ^_^)
 
The_Russian said:
This just proves you are an idiot.

my you're profound!
 
Sniper Bob said:
Does it bother you that a group of individuals choose to wear attire that reflects their love and support of their country?

What is your problem? Hey Captain America, it sounds like you have a chip on your shoulder. I only think that it would be an issue if this tie was mandatory.
 
dseagrav said:
Yes, it's a disgusting and inappropriate gesture completely counter to the ideals of modern Americanism. How are we supposed to promote diversity and individuality in an environment where people unite for a common cause rather than fight one another over their differences? Solidarity is the enemy of progress!

Take off the Master's yoke from your neck! Don't unite, untie!

(I've been saving that line for a while now. This thread was tailor-made for it! ^_^)

You sir, are one funny *************************er. That was quite good.:D
 
The_Russian said:
This just proves you are an idiot.
couldn't resist posting again because you remind me of a dispute I had when I was a kid playing marbles. :laugh: his only answer to the dispute was calling everyone an idiot...this kid had real emotional issues and he usually went home crying.:laugh:

okay Russian, you win the game.



what will you call me next? poopyhead maybe?
 
Are you inferring that there were no 'suspicious' deaths under Clinton (Vince Foster comes to mind). Also are you ignoring that several of the worlds top spy agencies came to the same conculsion (England and Israel come to mind).

Sure we didn't lose many military guys under Clinton, but we lost 3000 of our neighbors because he was to busy chasing interns and covering his tracks to chase Bin Laden and uncover HIS tracks.
 
gator_hater said:
Are you inferring that there were no 'suspicious' deaths under Clinton (Vince Foster comes to mind). Also are you ignoring that several of the worlds top spy agencies came to the same conculsion (England and Israel come to mind).

Sure we didn't lose many military guys under Clinton, but we lost 3000 of our neighbors because he was to busy chasing interns and covering his tracks to
chase Bin Laden and uncover HIS tracks.
Do you mean implying? And yes, I am implying that there is not enough evidence to support the notion that Clinton had anything to do with any murders. If you provide a link, it will have 0 credibility to me if its some right wing whacko organization.

Au contraire. The Clinton White House did indeed go after Bin Laden and it was much more than the misdirected cruise missles. Bin Laden was the number one target for US intelligence in Clinton's terms. It is popular for the dittoheads, the Hannity's etc to superficially say that he did nothing......far from the truth. It is the Bush administration that ignored warnings that terrorists were planning on using airplanes as missles. Clinton's admin provided all of the material that stated that there was going to a massive attack on the passdown to the new admin. What did Bush do? Nothing. Before 9-11, Bush even complained that the daily intel involved too many pages and he wanted them condensed. He was more concerned with tax cuts for the wealthy and trying to placate Americans by providing a $300.00 dollar advance. Bush and his admin lied about WMD's to justify his personal vendetta and now 2500 soldiers are dead.

My signature stands.

"Will somebody gove Bush a blowjob so we can impeach him?!?!"
BIll Maher
 
Last edited:
waka said:
Do SW pilots have to wear the flag tie? It seems like that's all I see lately.

No one died when Clinton lied? I don't normally get into politcal arguments online, but this quote is just too harebrained for me to let it go unanswered. You realize that Clinton had the power to kill Bin Laden before 9/11, but sat on his ass and didnt? How many lives was that? And I'm sick of the left skewing the view on the Iraq war. This is one of the most successful wars we have fought. Not that each and every life isn't important, but we've lost ten times that number in single days in other wars! Get your !$@% facts right before you post some idiotic, half baked MORON tag line online.
 
Alex429595 said:
No one died when Clinton lied? I don't normally get into politcal arguments online, but this quote is just too harebrained for me to let it go unanswered. You realize that Clinton had the power to kill Bin Laden before 9/11, but sat on his ass and didnt? How many lives was that? And I'm sick of the left skewing the view on the Iraq war. This is one of the most successful wars we have fought. Not that each and every life isn't important, but we've lost ten times that number in single days in other wars! Get your !$@% facts right before you post some idiotic, half baked MORON tag line online.
When you start thinking on your own instead of regurgitating what is spoonfed to you by someone else, then I'll have an intelligent discussion with you. Until then, you'll win every moron-athon.
 
Last edited:
TR4A said:
Let us know when you interview so we can write a letter for you.

It sounds like that you have deluded yourself by thinking that you have a claim to some sort of consensus. If you're empowered by a message board on the internet, go ahead, be my guest.

"The expression of insecurity is certainly not driven by intent"

R Galpith
 
waka said:
When you start thinking on your own instead of regurgitating what is spoonfed to you by someone else, then I'll have an intelligent discussion with you. Until then, you'll win every moron-athon.

No one spoon-fed me.

Remember those little Tea Parties Bill hosted in Somalia, Bosnia, and Yugoslovia? I was there. And what about the USS Cole? We lost lots of good people while Bill was busy getting a hummer in the Oral Office.
 
SMOE said:
No one spoon-fed me.

Remember those little Tea Parties Bill hosted in Somalia, Bosnia, and Yugoslovia? I was there. And what about the USS Cole? We lost lots of good people while Bill was busy getting a hummer in the Oral Office.

So what? One has nothing to do with the other. Using your logic (or lack thereof) Bush Junior had taken more vacations than any other president. So while he's basking in is own glory on his ranch lining the pockets of his contributors through no bid contracts, soldiers are dying in Iraq for his lies.
 
waka said:
So what? One has nothing to do with the other. Using your logic (or lack thereof) Bush Junior had taken more vacations than any other president. So while he's basking in is own glory on his ranch lining the pockets of his contributors through no bid contracts, soldiers are dying in Iraq for his lies.

Atleast he doesn't get his hair cut while sitting in AF1, while sitting on the ramp of a busy airport, while closing down all traffic at a major airport. And...perhaps if Clinton didnt get his hummer...he would not have needed to divert the American public's attention to Somalia, Bosnia and Yugoslovia. So, I guess a few good people did die when Clinton lied.
 
I'll admit I'm no fan of Clinton and becoming less of a Bush fan every day.

The proof that Bush lied is no stronger or weaker than that Clinton killed Vince Foster. A previous poster was correct when he mentioned that we lost 10x the number of guys in a matter of hours instead of three years. Bottom line every life is valuable and I'd rather fight the terrorists in Iraq than on my soil, not to mention depose a ruthless dictator in the process.

Clinton was a slacker in his responsibilities regarding terror, Clinton's admin propped up a smoke and mirrors economy. Bush is sidestepping immigration and not fighting to win, but rather fighting not to lose (ask anyone who runs a prevent defense in football how that works out.)

If i'm a kool-aid drinking rightwing nut, then you are a left wing nut and oh well. best of luck to ya.
 
gator_hater said:
I'll admit I'm no fan of Clinton and becoming less of a Bush fan every day.

The proof that Bush lied is no stronger or weaker than that Clinton killed Vince Foster. A previous poster was correct when he mentioned that we lost 10x the number of guys in a matter of hours instead of three years. Bottom line every life is valuable and I'd rather fight the terrorists in Iraq than on my soil, not to mention depose a ruthless dictator in the process.

Clinton was a slacker in his responsibilities regarding terror, Clinton's admin propped up a smoke and mirrors economy. Bush is sidestepping immigration and not fighting to win, but rather fighting not to lose (ask anyone who runs a prevent defense in football how that works out.)

If i'm a kool-aid drinking rightwing nut, then you are a left wing nut and oh well. best of luck to ya.
quick question; what terrorists have we fought on Iraqi soil?

best of luck back at ya:beer:
 
Metro752 said:
you're not serious are you?

yes, it's a serious question
 
I think what happened is that Waka go lost on his way to http://www.dailykos.com/ . This is a pilot board about pilot stuff, you want to talk politics, then the "non-aviation chat" would be a better forum. Although dseagrav did make the thread worth reading with his untie and tailor made comments.

Even better than dailykos, might I recommend http://www.nationalreview.com/ where you could go get yourself some knowledge. Are you hanging out on the 9/11 conspiracy threads also? GWB did it to increase Dick's Haliburton stock? Do you and Cynthia McKinney hang out and chat how the President kept reading those 2nd graders that story because 'he already knew what was happening'? Is the world such a scary place that you find fantasy more reassuring than reality?

I think most pragmatic people realize the reason for going to war in Iraq (WMDs on the ground) may have been incorrect (they're all in Syria now?) but we're there and a country and their people would be worse off if we abandoned them, ask the Vietnamese how the last 30 years have been. I mean, ask the ones that survived the re-education camps and the boat lifts.
 
Last edited:
firstthird said:
I think what happened is that Waka go lost on his way to http://www.dailykos.com/ . This is a pilot board about pilot stuff, you want to talk politics, then the "non-aviation chat" would be a better forum. Although I did like dseagrav made the thread worth reading with his untie and tailor made comments.

Even better than dailycos, might I recommend http://www.nationalreview.com/ where you could go get yourself some knowledge. Are you hanging out on the 9/11 conspiracy threads also? GWB did it to increase Dick's Haliburton stock? Do you and Cynthia McKinney hang out and chat how the President kept reading those 2nd graders that story because 'he already knew what was happening'? Is the world such a scary place that you find fantasy more reassuring than reality?

I think most pragmatic people realize the reason for going to war in Iraq (WMDs on the ground) may have been incorrect (they're all in Syria now?) but we're there and a country and their people would be worse off if we abandoned them, ask the Vietnamese how the last 30 years have been.
I mean, ask the ones that survived the re-education camps and the boat lifts.

If you were to just read a little, I started it as an aviation thread. It was hijacked by others.

With William F Buckley and his ilk, The National Review is way too biased for me. It's potato chips for the mind. No thanks.
 
Last edited:
I hope Big Slick doesn't see this thread :) !

Waka, you da man! Clinton is a god - thanks to him women in America have been put in their place.
 
My bad. I did read the beginning but I forgot by the time I got to the bottom. I see that your question was straight forward but pretty much everyone assumed you had an alternate agenda, which seems to be borne out by the subsequent info. But, to answer your initial question. No, we don't have to wear patriotic ties. There is a standard black tie. There are 3 patriotic ties. There is some other black/wavy pattern thing that looks like you spilled something on it (to me). And there is an 'Adopt-a-Pilot' tie that looks like some 3rd grader drew it, which some third grader did. Probably another one or two out there.

So, SWA pilots have a choice of ties within the 'approved' list. Sorry, no Che Guevera ties or Hammer & Sickle emblems, although I know those are considered hipster in certain circles.
 
firstthird said:
So, SWA pilots have a choice of ties within the 'approved' list. Sorry, no Che Guevera ties or Hammer & Sickle emblems, although I know those are considered hipster in certain circles.

Hammer and Sickle LOL!

Finally, I get a straight answer! Thanks.:)
 
Alex429595 said:
No one died when Clinton lied? I don't normally get into politcal arguments online, but this quote is just too harebrained for me to let it go unanswered. You realize that Clinton had the power to kill Bin Laden before 9/11, but sat on his ass and didnt? How many lives was that? And I'm sick of the left skewing the view on the Iraq war. This is one of the most successful wars we have fought. Not that each and every life isn't important, but we've lost ten times that number in single days in other wars! Get your !$@% facts right before you post some idiotic, half baked MORON tag line online.

how did he have the power when his military actions into bosnia were questioned by the GOP? Oh and that whole 70+ million dollars of tax payer money used to investigate his sexual escapades and impeachment trial probably didnt help him concentrate on "finding bin laden" right?

and can you actually point out any public calls for the capture of UBL, please?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom