Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest 300 / 500 question

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
So the 737 to 717 transitions will not respect seniority ?
Within base and equipment? Yes. System-wide? No.

Eg: ATL 737 bidding 717, will transfer to ATran 717 after a junior MKE 737 will transfer to ATran 717.

Did that make sense ?
In all likelihood, yes. When they pull down MKE 737's, if those 737 CA's bid to 717 CA, they would either have to force the MKE 737 CA's back to 737 CA ATL (which isn't one of the available bid choices) or put the MKE 737 CA's into the 717 training pipeline ahead of their more junior ATL counterparts.

That part isn't set in stone yet, still some tweaking to do (the transition committee is meeting this week), but why would a transitioning 737 to 717 pilot care when they go to training on the AirTran side? If I were going to have to transition aircraft like that, I'd probably choose to stay on my current equipment as long as possible unless the bidding position in the different equipment (717) was that much drastically better...?

Trying to understand the issue so I can forward it to the transition committee so they can decide if it's something we should address. We understand people unhappy about out-of-seniority transfers to SWA because of the large pay differential for F/O's, even though there's not much we can do about it, but not so sure about why transfers on the AAI side of the fence are as large of an issue...?
 
Last edited:
That part isn't set in stone yet, still some tweaking to do (the transition committee is meeting this week), but why would a transitioning 737 to 717 pilot care when they go to training on the AirTran side? If I were going to have to transition aircraft like that, I'd probably choose to stay on my current equipment as long as possible unless the bidding position in the different equipment (717) was that much drastically better...?

Trying to understand the issue so I can forward it to the transition committee so they can decide if it's something we should address. We understand people unhappy about out-of-seniority transfers to SWA because of the large pay differential for F/O's, even though there's not much we can do about it, but not so sure about why transfers on the AAI side of the fence are as large of an issue...?


An excellent question;

There are CA's on the 737 that would be junior lineholders on the 717. On the 737 they are senior RSV (PARLC etc.) They stayed on the 737 during the old contract because a 'build up line' was a pretty good deal. The new contract has destroyed any ability to make money on any RSV line, including the PARLC. Thank you PCL, I told you so ;) Now they want to exercise their seniority and hold a line on the 717. This is the first opportunity for them to move to the 717 since the world ended last year.

Since this is a bid. It should be done in seniority.



- Apologies for the thread hi jack. I like all of those funny round thingies that look like little watches on the 737-300 instrument panel. Very retro.
(Added to make this post relevant to the thread title)
 
Lear, is there any idea of how many pilots will bypass training? Sounds like there needs to be a new poll on the myseniority.com site. Thanks for the update.
 
Dicko, it's a good point. I'll pass it along.

WP, I don't know. It probably WOULD be good to put that on Jamie's website, as everyone will have different ideas of how/when they want to go over and why.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom