If fares do pick up, that's great for all of us.
If fares do pick up substantially, and business travel returns, then "Leo's Gamble" of taking huge losses to keep marketshare will probably look pretty darn smart.
If anything else happens (ie another terorist attack involving airlines, prolonged recession, loss of an aircraft in flight, etc.) then it will be a huge waste of cash.
You are right, general, about the loss figure I posted being wrong- the third quarter loss is projected right now to be about $2.5 million a day . . . I have corrected my earlier post and here is a link to the info:
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/030717/airlines_delta_loss_1.html
Note that when the CFO refers to a cash burn rate it is not the same as a loss . . . . she says they burned $1.1 million a day in Q2, even though the actual loss (before Gummint Cheese and sale of Worldspan) was really closer to $2.5 million a day:
"Excluding federal aid and $176 million after-tax from the sale of its stake in reservations firm Worldspan, Delta posted a loss of $237 million, or $1.95 per share. Before items, the company reported a loss in last year's second quarter of $162 million, or $1.34 a share".
In any event, I think whatever you guys agree to at Song is going to become the standard for mainline operations . . . which is why, I am sure, you guys are dragging your feet on negotiations.
In any event, I am sure Delta will make it through all this, I just wonder in what form, and what lessons we will all learn looking in the rearview mirror.