Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

So much for the huge growth rumor at SW

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Bad timing on all those disclosures. Has all the pilots thinking much harder about being at the bottom of the list...

Exactly. However, it could be planned for a different reason. He wants this to go to arbitration too.

That way the SWA f/os can be upset at the arbitrator and not the company.
 
Heard it said really well today- if you guys want to treat GK with all the suspicion of just any standard airline exec, at some point he might just cut his losses and treat you like any old airline employee.

What's he on record as saying- he wants us to be proud of how we handled this acquisition and how we treated each other during it.

He can't tell us everything- but I'm learning he says what he means.

Besides- how does voting no help out the 717 situation.
 
Aren't there enough combined (SW and AAI) orders to easily replace the 717 on a scheduled basis?

RF

Probably, but it all depends on the placement on the Boeing line. Personally, I think the AAI order schedule was one of the big selling points for the merger.
 
Aren't there enough combined (SW and AAI) orders to easily replace the 717 on a scheduled basis?

RF

Yes, but the language in SL9 doesn't require integration of the 717 fleet. Complete Operational Integration can be delayed indefinitely upon agreement between SWAPA and SWA.

If COI doesn't happen before the 717's are integrated, there's nothing that says the pilots on them get to come over to new 737's as they are replaced.

Even if they did, are there enough scheduled deliveries to cover both the scheduled 737-300 AND 717 retirements combined simultaneously? I don't know the answer to that one, but if the first issue above is covered satisfactorily in the 4-party agreement, then this needs to be answered before the 717 folks can relax.

Lots of moving parts. Not that any of us THINK SWA plans on furloughing anyone, and in arbitration no one knows how any protections would play out, except overall better seniority as a buffer, but better to make sure it's a covered contingency.
 
AAI relative seniority was worth $ZZZ.ZZ

SWAPA relative seniority is worth 1.A X $ZZZ.ZZ

Where "A" equals the difference in contract value.

For an FO the difference was probably about 9 and a CA about 5.

Seniority at AAI was worth less and that is why you are giving up "seniority".

Can't have it all ladies.


Arbitrators don't seem to care too much about payrates or dollar values. The Colgan pilots were paid among the worst in all the regionals, yet they were placed evenly through the PNCL and Mesaba combined list. The DL/NWA merger had a joint contract done FIRST, with everyone on the same type planes getting equal pay, before the SLI was decided by the 3 arbitrators. Hmmmm. I don't think your higher pay and benefits would matter too much to the arbitrators.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
What's he on record as saying- he wants us to be proud of how we handled this acquisition and how we treated each other during it. .

Apparently he doesn't read FI.com.
 
Heard it said really well today- if you guys want to treat GK with all the suspicion of just any standard airline exec, at some point he might just cut his losses and treat you like any old airline employee.

What's he on record as saying- he wants us to be proud of how we handled this acquisition and how we treated each other during it.

He can't tell us everything- but I'm learning he says what he means.

Besides- how does voting no help out the 717 situation.

IF the Airtran MEC votes NO, then they can get some better language protecting everyone, including any 717 pilots. Why wouldn't anyone want that? You're all family now, live it!


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
IF the Airtran MEC votes NO, then they can get some better language protecting everyone, including any 717 pilots.

Bye Bye---General Lee

Exactly how would that play out General? Gary holds the key to better language, not SWAPA, not ALPA, and especially not the arbitor.

RF
 

Latest resources

Back
Top