Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
- Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
- Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
- Share the passion for aviation
- Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun
sli at rah
- Thread starter dlzav8tr
- Start date
- Watchers 23
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
- Invite your friends
- Share the passion of aviation
- Friendliest aviation community on the web
Republic
StaySeated
IBT does not represent ME
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2001
- Posts
- 782
221 aircraft in 2008 down to around 177? That is a difference of 20%. The branded flying is increasing rapidly, so without the new branded flying RAH would be 1/4 of its size only one year ago. All numbers come from SEC docs.
En Mort Main
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 12, 2006
- Posts
- 81
your math makes no sense. I have no idea how the loss of 44 aircraft is down to a quarter of what RAH had?
Are you trying to say the would have lost a quarter of their aircraft or conversly would be 3/4 of its size a year ago?
Further more you state that it is a lose of 20% wouldn't we then be dealing with fifths and not fourths?
Correct me if i am wrong
En mort main
Are you trying to say the would have lost a quarter of their aircraft or conversly would be 3/4 of its size a year ago?
Further more you state that it is a lose of 20% wouldn't we then be dealing with fifths and not fourths?
Correct me if i am wrong
En mort main
StaySeated
IBT does not represent ME
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2001
- Posts
- 782
The math makes sense, it was my wording that was wrong. They would be 3/4 of their size, losing 1/4 of the fee based flying this year and additional reduction in the beginning of 2010. The only growth is in the branded flying.
$$$4nothin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2004
- Posts
- 815
Incorrect: RAH bought Frontier. No outsourcing took place. It would be like saying TWA outsourced flying to AA when they were bought.
godsgift2aviatn
Members Only
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Posts
- 89
king10pin02
Left seat warmer
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2006
- Posts
- 215
exactly, arbitration should be done in may, all this discusion does is foster negativity.
Easy to say when you have a job
godsgift2aviatn
Members Only
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Posts
- 89
That's irelavent. Having a job or not having one, won't affect the outcome. Neither will pissing and moaning on this site. As a matter of fact, no amount of speculation done here will have any effect on the outcome. It will mereley serve to aggrivate your coworkers. If that is what you strive for you have no place at RAH.
firstthird
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2001
- Posts
- 687
CitationLover
Aw, Nuts!
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2003
- Posts
- 3,316
godsgift2aviatn
Members Only
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Posts
- 89
Uhhhh. I call for civilized discourse as opposed to childish banter and you equate that with subservience to Bedford?
Citation=bitter piss ant.
godsgift2aviatn
Members Only
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Posts
- 89
Furloughed or not he/she is still part of the RAH employee group. Irresponsible speculation will not serve to engender good will amongst the pilot groups but will only cause division and an unsafe work enviornment for those currently employed.
hockeypilot44
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
- Posts
- 893
At this point the damage is irreparable anyway. You guys put an ENTIRE airline out of work with your pathetic contract. I am sure these guys are going to come back with smiles on their faces. They'll probably share cookies with you in the cockpit.
Share this page
Latest resources
-
-
-
-
-
AC 90-89C - Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing HandbookAmateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing Handbook
- Neal
- Updated:
