Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bmpilot2003 said:The reason why Skywest is not looking at the E-170/190 is because of the dispatch reliability of those planes. Which currently at $hit taco is 30-40%, while the SkyWest/ASA RJs are in 80% range.
bmpilot2003 said:The reason why Skywest is not looking at the E-170/190 is because of the dispatch reliability of those planes. Which currently at $hit taco is 30-40%, while the SkyWest/ASA RJs are in 80% range.
Is this your way of saying you pulled those numbers out of your ass?bmpilot2003 said:I orignally said 80% because i didnt want to overstate the numbers. I also new that the number was most likely in the 90s. The fact of the matter is the CRJ is much more reliable than the "E-180".
Cram a yes-vote down our throats? How exactly do you think they're going to do that? Here's an easy way to avoid that unpleasant scenario: VOTE NO.bmpilot2003 said:By the looks of it management will probably cram a yes vote down all our throats and we will be flying 705s and 900s for 50 seat pay.
~~~^~~~ said:Anyone consider the effect the E170 would have on ASA's parking plan?