Weasil
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2003
- Posts
- 752
That would make sense if it weren't completely wrong. Small jets burn far more fuel than larger ones on a CASM basis, which is all that matters. If Delta could fill up an A380 from DAY to CVG they would put an A380 on that route. Unfortunately demand for DAY-CVG doesn't warrant an Airbus.
If an airline really wanted to curb fuel costs it would modernize the fleet by replacing 50 seat RJs with large turboprops and pressure Boeing and Airbus to build a replacement for the 737 and A320 with modern (read: fuel saving) technology. There is a company who is developing a system to taxi airplanes with an electric motor. How much fuel is wasted each year taxiing to and from runways? Anyway the point is there are plenty ways to modernize the national fleet to save fuel costs, but airlines in this country aren't progressive.
Actually I think we are saying the same thing. I never said that "small jets" burn less fuel. I said regional aircraft - i was referring to those same large turboprops you are. I guess I just didn't make that clear.
And I wasn't referring to the replacement of mainline 737's at all, I was thinking more along the lines of the MD80 and DC9 fleets that I believe will be replaced by large regional jets. In other words I think we are going to see a decrease in the size of mainline domestic fleets and a further increase in the regional fleets. In the long term though something will have to give because as oil supplies disappear over the next 20-30 years oil will become too expensive to use for aircraft at all. I certainly don't think we are ever going to see things return to the way they were last century.