Many are still leaving at 60, and the highest-wage earners aren't the problem.
Once again, you have no idea what you're talking about. At United alone, the monthly retirement rate's gone from ~30/month to 2-3 month.
If you consider 2-3 'many,' fine. In the dictionary, 2-3 is best defined as 'few.' Even 'several' is an incorrect description.
Other than American, where retirements are tied to a lookback of AMR's stock price, you arent' going to find a lot of retirements. And retirements at AMR will also come to a standstill once the stock price stabilizes.
You are unable to grasp the simple concept that the lack of retirements is resulting in many on the bottom end taking any job that they can find.
As the furloughs pick up steam, a lot of those furloughees are going to end up finding a job anywhere. It won't matter that the companies are paying less than Skybus wages.
So, instead of retirements at age 60, we're going to see the bottom of the losing their jobs and going to work anywhere that they can find a job. What will be the effect industrywide? More wage cuts.
Your inability to apply the laws of supply and demand to this business never ceases to amaze me. Now, care to share your dad's story? Guys like him are a BIG part of the problem. The difference between his behavior and the guy on the bottom of the list going to work at Skybus is, well, he wasn't at the bottom of the list.