Shooting at LAX

[Patriot328]

Another tea party nutcase

Yep those tea party people are really shooting up the place...



In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.

In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States, who later died from the wound.

In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.

In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.

In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.

In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.

In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.

In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school.

Recently an angry Democrat shoots 12 at a Navy ship yard .

 

[ImbracableCrunk]

Yep those tea party people are really shooting up the place...



In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.

In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States, who later died from the wound.

In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.

In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.

In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.

In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.

In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.

In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school.

Recently an angry Democrat shoots 12 at a Navy ship yard .

That's some nice copy-pasta. I'm sure some of that is correct, but some of it is wrong, (eg. Seung Hui Cho is Korean, and couldn't vote/register in the US) and it isn't an exhaustive list of killers. That's what we call the "cherry-picking" fallacy.

Google "Republican Serial Killers" and let us know the results, and tell us if it's relevant. Are you a serial killer? You might be, since 80% or serial killers are Republican, or so the copy-pasta says.

In other words, people don't be blind. You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.

 

[Tweaker]

What colour is the sky in your dream state, Inbredable Crank?

The list left off the Democrat who brought hate chikin (Chik-Fil-A) to the Family Research Council and began his shooting rampage, wounding a brave negro security guard who thwarted the attempt.

Extra credit because the nut job Democrat learned to target the eeevil FRC from the ultra liberal Southern Poverty Law Center.

"In 2010, the Southern Poverty Law Center named the FRC a "hate group" for opposing the homosexual agenda, along with several other Christian organizations. The Human Rights Campaign also called the Christian organization a "hate group" for disagreeing with gay marriage.
Commenters at the HRC article blamed the pro-gay group for the shooting.
"Your article has lead to a shooting at the Family Research Center... you should feel disgusted with yourself, (sic)" wrote "Breitbart_Lives.""

http://www.examiner.com/article/report-family-research-center-shooter-carried-chick-fil-a-bag



Why don't you do some research, Crank? He does not work for you.

Stop mumbling to yourself, take your fingers out of your ears, and put them to work on your keyboard to prove your 80% fabrication.

All that hate's gonna burn you up, girl!

 

[ImbracableCrunk]

If someone makes a claim, they need to rely on FACTS to prove it. Too many people rely on the laziness of viewers, listeners, and readers to assume facts not in evidence that support their biases.

If you can't rely on facts to win an argument, then it's an argument that doesn't deserve to win.

 

[NEDude]

Yep those tea party people are really shooting up the place...



In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.

In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States, who later died from the wound.

In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.

In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.

In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.

In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.

In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.

In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school.

Recently an angry Democrat shoots 12 at a Navy ship yard .

Source?

 

[Tweaker]

(Crank jams fingers into ears so far he begins bleeding)

 

[ImbracableCrunk]

(Crank jams fingers into ears so far he begins bleeding)

Really? You don't even question that list, do you? You might even be happy knowing that it probably has falsehoods.

Stop mumbling to yourself, take your fingers out of your ears, and put them to work on your keyboard to prove your 80% fabrication.

That's the point. Anyone can post anything from the internet and hold it up as truth. I was pointing that out by saying, "or so the copy-pasta says."

I bet if I ask a question, you will respond with another. Let's try it:

Is that list of shooters correct?

and:

Can you respond without name calling?

 

[dicko]

Who cares what he thinks, he can go back to England. Chaps my ass when foriegners come over and run their mouth about what happens here. Go worry about your own f@cking country.

Damn right ! Can't stand them myself. Nice to see another Native American on Flight Info. What Tribe ?

 

[Tweaker]

Crank,
If you doubt the items on that list, and call it false, it is up to you and not him to demonstrate otherwise. He made the submission and is comfortable with it. Get your hands dirty, to match your fingers that are covered with ear wax.

Is that list of shooters correct?
I read it and I am familiar with enough of them to be comfortable with accepting them as fact, in so far as the consequences of error are low.

In fact, there are several that are missing. I even included one. Have you attempted to prove me or him wrong, or are willing to accept these facts as presented yet?

and:

Can you respond without name calling?

I can. However, so as to keep the users here clear in my mind, I refer to you by the name I provide you, not the similarly non-authentic name you provided for us to call you here.

 

[ImbracableCrunk]

Crank,
If you doubt the items on that list, and call it false, it is up to you and not him to demonstrate otherwise. He made the submission and is comfortable with it. Get your hands dirty, to match your fingers that are covered with ear wax.

Is that list of shooters correct?
I read it and I am familiar with enough of them to be comfortable with accepting them as fact, in so far as the consequences of error are low.

In fact, there are several that are missing. I even included one. Have you attempted to prove me or him wrong, or are willing to accept these facts as presented yet?

and:

Can you respond without name calling?

I can. However, so as to keep the users here clear in my mind, I refer to you by the name I provide you, not the similarly non-authentic name you provided for us to call you here.

I already gave one example of the Virginia Tech shooter being a Korean national, and therefore not a US voter. I already pointed this out, and you, sir, had your fingers in your ears.

You're fully comfortable with half-truths, as long as they support your view.