His summation fits perfectly, and boils down to the point that the hard-line stance is the irresponsible, untenable, and losing stance.
Good thing USAPA doesn't have a hard-line stance written into their constitution and bylaws.
oh.
If your referring to me specifically then all you need to do is search my past years posts on this and see that this is always where I've stood on the issue. The times I've argued doh was more siding with doh when only compared with the nic as doh vs nic I'd have to say that given only these two routes I'd have to pick doh as it is more closely aligned with years of service than nic.