Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Senate bill would mandate more research for pilot fatigue

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

diggertwo

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
65
http://www.pilotbug.com/?p=279

Included in the Senate's FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act is a provision which will address long sought after issues on pilot flight time, duty and rest. It mandates that within 3 months of the enactment of the bill into law, the FAA, in conjunction with the Academy of Sciences, will conduct a study of pilot fatigue.


The study will include research on:
(1) research on fatigue, sleep, and circadian rhythms;
(2) sleep and rest requirements recommended by the National Transportation Safety Board; and
(3) international standards.


Within 18 months of the study, the Academy of Sciences will present the findings, along with recommendations for the FAA to implement in future rule-making in regards to flight time and rest requirements.


Also within this portion of the bill is a similar proposal to address flight attendant rest and fatigue to be conducted by the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute.


The push toward more defined rest rules was initiated by the crash in February of Continental Connection Flight 3407, which took 50 lives, including one on the ground. It has been speculated that fatigue may have been a contributing factor in the crash, as investigators tried to reconstruct the flight crew's sleep and rest in the 24 hours prior to the flight.
 
Sleeping in the Cockpit

Will this be addressed. FAA did study in the late 80's early 90's and recommend controlled sleeping in the cockpit was the best way to combat fatigue. They studied the occurrence of micro naps, these are naps that you have no control over, and you nod off. On crews studied who did not have controlled sleeping in the cockpit there were 147 occurrences of micro nap, a number of them during the approach phase. On the crews at foreign airlines that allowed sleeping in the cockpit, there were no occurrences of micro naps during the approach phase. The FAA recommended that controlled napping in the cockpit be adopted as US policy, however Gov’t officials felt that official recognition of sleeping on the job was un-American. Sorry of a mirco-nap. When you fly shifting schedules, you have to plan sleeping otherwise it is uncontrollable. Having one guy rest his eyes for 20 minutes, when other one knows it is going on does wonders for your ability to make that tight approach at the end of the night. However when everyone in the cockpit is asleep, that is scary. We used to fly these night and day patrols around Vietnam, terrible schedule, 12 hr flights, fly a day flight 12 hours off fly a night flight, 24 hrs off fly a day flight. 10 days in a row. One night off the south end of the country, at 0300, nothing is going on, no contacts, no chatter on the intercom, I am fighting off sleep and loosing, a mirco-nap hits and I nod off. I wake up, you do not know if it has been 30 seconds or 30 minutes, we are on the autopilot' at 1,500’, #1 engine in the bag to save fuel, and all 10 of the crew is asleep. Talk about being wide-awake, Where the are we? Now how do you wake up the PPC without letting him know you nodded off also? The F/E was also in the bag. So I called for "Coffee around for my friends" The point is the worse thing about sleeping in the cockpit is letting it sneak up on you, You know it might happen, plan on when it is going to happen, control it.
 
I predict more money wasted, and new rules that result in more rest and fewer days at home......

Be careful what you wish for....
 
http://www.pilotbug.com/?p=279

Included in the Senate's FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act is a provision which will address long sought after issues on pilot flight time, duty and rest. It mandates that within 3 months of the enactment of the bill into law, the FAA, in conjunction with the Academy of Sciences, will conduct a study of pilot fatigue.


The study will include research on:
(1) research on fatigue, sleep, and circadian rhythms;
(2) sleep and rest requirements recommended by the National Transportation Safety Board; and
(3) international standards.


Within 18 months of the study, the Academy of Sciences will present the findings, along with recommendations for the FAA to implement in future rule-making in regards to flight time and rest requirements.


Also within this portion of the bill is a similar proposal to address flight attendant rest and fatigue to be conducted by the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute.


The push toward more defined rest rules was initiated by the crash in February of Continental Connection Flight 3407, which took 50 lives, including one on the ground. It has been speculated that fatigue may have been a contributing factor in the crash, as investigators tried to reconstruct the flight crew's sleep and rest in the 24 hours prior to the flight.


Sounds like more BS lip service to pander to voters that they are "doing everything possible" while really not doing anything that could piss off the lobbies lining these bums' pockets.
 
And they will make no more money

airlines will need more pilots if we have to have more rest.
So the present salaries will have to be spread amongst more pilots ='s less pay per pilot, because the airline will still fly the same number of hours. Or the ticket price can rise and result in fewer tickets sold, ='s need for fewer pilots. There is no easy answer when the consumer determines how much money you can charge for an airline ticket.
 
Sounds like more BS lip service to pander to voters that they are "doing everything possible" while really not doing anything that could piss off the lobbies lining these bums' pockets.

Actually, I think this language (which is also in HR915) will be moot since the FAA has already created an ARC to change the rest requirements. By the way, this was not pandering on the part of some congressman. This was lobbied for by ALPA a couple of years ago.

Seven ALPA Pilots Chosen for FAA ARC

The FAA is undertaking a comprehensive review of flight-time and duty-time (FT/DT) regulations to better reflect current research on sleep, rest periods, and alertness. The next phase of the process in updating FT/DT rules is to convene an Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC), a group made up of representatives from labor, industry, and the FAA, who will draft the proposed changes. Seven ALPA pilots have been selected to participate in this endeavor. ALPA’s executive administrator, Capt. Don Wykoff, will co-chair the ARC. Other pilots who will serve include Capt. Bill Soer (FDX), Capt. Darrel Cox (MSA), Capt. Greg Whiting (UAL), and Capt. Michael Hynes (CAL). Capt. Matt Rettig (EGL) and Capt. Peter Davis (ASA) will act as alternates.

These gentlemen will be crucial in helping other ARC participants understand the practical applications of the rules and the pilot perspective.
ALPA has long been a proponent of updating FT/DT regulations to better reflect the existing science. In a recent statement, ALPA president Capt. John Prater said, “Considering that the pilot flight-time and rest rules in use today were created more than 60 years ago, it becomes immediately clear that we need a swift and innovative approach to modernizing these standards.”
http://public.alpa.org/portals/alpa/...0090717.htm#03
 
Last edited:
So the present salaries will have to be spread amongst more pilots ='s less pay per pilot, because the airline will still fly the same number of hours. Or the ticket price can rise and result in fewer tickets sold, ='s need for fewer pilots. There is no easy answer when the consumer determines how much money you can charge for an airline ticket.

well at least management will still get their raises though.....
 
airlines will need more pilots if we have to have more rest.

1. Not necessarily....you may just end up working more days to get the same amount of block time.

2. Is now really the time to increase costs on our business....That will make it even harder to negotiate pay increases.....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top