Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Scope Defeating Freedom Airlines

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hey FlyinBrian,

You bring up some very good points in your last post. You also bring them from your perspective. From your profile your flying a Saab with 1300 hours. Your probably in your first "airline job" with a commuter. And as of right now, your enduring probably your first furlough. My point is that once you get a few more years in this industry I believe that you will have some differing opinions about your union, scope clauses and the true value of your experience. Just my opinion though.

fatburger.........................a furloughed brother
 
Hey Boeingman;

Your only point from the previous post you left was not that I had a chip on my shoulder. It was that CAL pilots, due to their contract, deserved to flow back to COEX. You stated that when times are good COEX flowed to CAL and now due to the contract it is time to flow back. Your previous post seemed to indicate that you couldn't care less about the COEX folks that were displaced. I think that it proves my point entirely about what Major airline pilots think of those that earn less money and fly smaller equipment.

I enjoy my job very much and have no desire to fly for an airline of any size. I fly 600 hrs per year and am home every night. I can retire early have good bennies and have decided that watching my 2 small boys grow up is more important than the size of airplane I fly. If you think this is some kind of excuse for not doing what you are doing you are very wrong. By the way how many wives have you had?? I hope only 1 but given the nature of the airline business you are probably on 2 if not 3. How much time have you missed with your kids?? So far I have been there for EVERYTHING. Some day when you are gasping for your last breath that big shiney airplane won't be there to hold your hand.

No sit down and carefully think out a response. Come on you can do it :]
 
Hey Earl,

Please don't speak for all of us major airline pilots. I have one question for you: Did you think that those furloughed at COEX knew about the flow through agreement? If they did, then they knew there was a chance that it could flow the other way too.

Your attitude will change, and I bet you'll take a job at a major in a heartbeat when things get good again. Kids get expensive as I am soon to find out!!:)

Fatburger............furloughed and on wife #1 with Kid #1 due in 7
days.
 
earlthesquirrel said:
Hey Boeingman;

Your only point from the previous post you left was not that I had a chip on my shoulder. It was that CAL pilots, due to their contract, deserved to flow back to COEX. You stated that when times are good COEX flowed to CAL and now due to the contract it is time to flow back. Your previous post seemed to indicate that you couldn't care less about the COEX folks that were displaced. I think that it proves my point entirely about what Major airline pilots think of those that earn less money and fly smaller equipment.

I enjoy my job very much and have no desire to fly for an airline of any size. I fly 600 hrs per year and am home every night. I can retire early have good bennies and have decided that watching my 2 small boys grow up is more important than the size of airplane I fly. If you think this is some kind of excuse for not doing what you are doing you are very wrong. By the way how many wives have you had?? I hope only 1 but given the nature of the airline business you are probably on 2 if not 3. How much time have you missed with your kids?? So far I have been there for EVERYTHING. Some day when you are gasping for your last breath that big shiney airplane won't be there to hold your hand.

No sit down and carefully think out a response. Come on you can do it :]

You have not proved squat. I only care about the contract and it's proper enforcement. If that puts CO EX on the street per the FTA that is the breaks. If you could stop talking out of your ass for just a second you'd realize that some CAL guys are not eligible for the flowback either and are on the street. But you ran your mouth off without any knowledge of what the facts are and you got busted on it.

Yes they deserved to flow back to Express because of the FTA. You're also forgetting these CAL guys had their seniority dilluted by Express pilots coming over with them as new hires. It is a 2 way street Earl. There are ups and downs with every issue. During the hiring the common theme for people wanting to work for Express was the opportunity for a set flow to mainline. So I don't buy and don't try the song and dance they didn't know. The FTA was very clear.

I think it is comical you continue to ignore the importance of a collective bargaining agreement and it's proper application with the FTA at CAL. However, I must consider the source of someone who makes a statement of "not wanting to work for any airline of any size". You do not have a clue about contracts and CBA's that is quite clear.

Your continued whining about this perceived lack of respect about pilots who fly smaller equipment for lower pay must be from the root of some deep seated emotional hangup about major airline pilots. Those that are happy with your situation do not seem to have the need to belittle and berate pilots flying larger equipment for more money. Ususally, It is because they cannot get hired on with a major. Your attitude drips with a thinly veiled jealousy that becomes clearer with each word.


I don't really remember asking, nor could I care about you, your family your lifestyle etc. etc. Why you choose to bring it up and ask about mine I don't know. It must make you feel better to soothe that pain of not being able to cut it and improve your lifestyle, career or financial situation. But since you probed....


I can assure you my friend, financially I could buy and sell you in a heartbeat. My CAL salary is nothing compared to my other income from a business I own. Your schoolyard chiding of not flying my "shiny airplane" to me, is a joke. I am also still on my first wife.

I have spent a lot of time away from my family defending our country to give morons like you the ability to have, among other things, the freedom of speech. What effort, contribution or sacrifices have you given Earl? Or are you the type to just rely on others to protect your way of life? Given the above, I'll be **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**ed to have some little piss ant pass judgement on my choice of career and use a lame value of staying away from my family. My family lives a very good life for my efforts.

Sure I don't see every little function at school, but I can tell you they will go to the best colleges and will not worry about finances through and for their education. Nor will I. Everything is a trade off Earl. Everything has a price.

As far as your airplane size mantra. I graduated #2 in my UPT class. I had a choice of airplanes and I passed on the C-5 for the tiny little F-4 Phantom. So you can take your size theory and stuff that as well. At CAL, I can hold 777 CA but I don't. I don't need the money nor the "size" fixation you have doesn't matter to me here. Strike 2 partner.

Your squirrel handle is quite appropriate Earl.
 
Last edited:
Points

Wile a number of good points have been made here are a few bottom liners:

1.. there will be hardly any regionals anymore that are not flying regional jets, therefore if mainline pilots take over, there are no regionals anymore.

2.. JO has a contract with USAirways that effects his ability to do business with other airlines and on his own. This is an impossible situation. America West and USAirways are the weakest major carriers. He is in the position of being handcuffed by carriers that may not even be here in several years.

3.. In effect, regional pilots are being screwed by all parties. They are being impacted by Agreements that did not contemplate the current situation. Their growth is being negatively effected by scope agreements that cater to major pilots to the negative of regional pilots.

4. So far, ALPA is doing a better job of helping Southwest and AirTran take over mainline markets than they could do on their own. In absense of a regional, they become the low cost provider.

5. There is a reason for regionals. It is not to employ pilots. It is to provide market establishment and maintenance at a low cost, let me repeat, at a low cost.

6. This flying does not belong to anyone. the consumer does not belong to anyone.

7. Management and the consumer have the right to spend their money the way they want. They both have the right to vote with their feet.
 
??

earlthesquirrel said:
By the way how many wives have you had?? I hope only 1 but given the nature of the airline business you are probably on 2 if not 3.


What is that supposed to mean? :mad:
 
You guys that see Freedom Air as a great opportunity have your heads where the sun don't shine. We will be f*cked as rj pilots if guys like Orenstein can hoar out his jets to supplement mainline flying. We are not talking about little jets here, we are talking about 84 seats! The Fokker 100 holds 88 in American's configuation. Here are the approx. salaries for the a 9 year capt and second year fo:
Capt: $158/hour
FO: $61/hour

Now call me crazy, but I bet American bought the airplane anticipating to make a profit in a good market. Know what do you suppose Orenstein is going to pay? You'll be lucky to see 100 bucks an hour for a captain. Now why should you fly make 58 bucks less to fly an airplane w/four less seats? With a non-union outfit like Freedom operating rj pilots will stand no chance of getting our wages inline with mainline eventhough the planes we fly are producing the same amount of revenue. In short you are the same thing as cheap immigrant labor!

Listen to the older guys on this board. Frank Lorenzo used this exact form of garbage when he started NY Air, which lead him down the road to ruining alot of lives. This whole deal may seem good in the short term, but you will be shooting yourselves in the foot in the long term.
 
Brotherhood???

This industry sounds more like a pond full of piranas who have run out of fresh meat and have begun feeding on themselves.
Coming from the business world I simply cannot believe that there are educated adults amoung us here who just don't grasp the realities of a market economy. Earl, Brian and a couple of others have it right. THE MARKET WILL ULTIMATELY DETERMINE EVERYTHING, not any union, nor any contract. Face it, due to economic realities regionals are becoming something more than a dues-paying stepping stone to the majors. The old Soviet Union tried to manage their economy. Just doesn't work.
A million years ago dinosaurs ruled the food chain. Then drastic changes in the environment caused that to change. Major airlines may be the dinosaurs of our economy. I don't think they'll become extinct but must certainly learn to adapt to the new realities and become a different animal in order to survive. Survival of the fittest. Right now the regionals seem to be the best suited for flourishing. Artificial constraints will not in the long run defeat the market. JO and Freedom are proving that, and all the gnashing of the teeth of every mainline pilot and all the unions in the world cannot change that. Every other industry has had to adapt to new realities. Why should the airlines be any different? Is it right or wrong? Irrevelant. It's just reality.
Oh, and another immutable reality . . . human nature. We're all out for our own selfish interests. Screw the rest. . . I've got mine.
There's your brotherhood.
 
SOME people are looking out for only thier own interests, as that is human nature, but some others think of everyone. The best way to stop this C scale madness is to use the policy our union has in place to remedy the situation. It's called the merger and fragmentation policy. It was recently changed to say that "regionals" should not be counted as airlines, but luckily, our lawsuit was filed before that quick change was made. The rjdc is the only way out of this, and the only group fighting for your rights. No matter what you may hear from people who hate them, they are going to make things better for EVERY pilot.
 
You guys are going to have to realize that the same things that attracted you to aviation are those same things that were won by organized labor within the industry.

If you for a moment think that Freedom Air is going to pay anywhere near scale or be anything more than flying bus drivers, you're kidding yourself.

They're going to fill the captain seats, out of seniority, with captains that don't have the ability or want to move on to another airline.

Then they're going to fill the FO seats with pay-for-training new pilots.

If they get captains that don't want to or don't have the ability to move on to other regionals and/or majors, they're paying far lower attrition costs.

It's all about the bottom line, baby!

When they hire pay-for-training FO's, they're virtually cost-free to bring them up to speed and they're going to pay them rock bottom wages because they CAN.

I've flown for a non-union carrier before and IT IS NOT GOOD. If the company busts the FAA's duty regulations, who are you going to call? The FAA? They really don't get involved with stuff like that.

If the company says, "Fly the (unairworthy) aircraft or get fired" who are you going to turn to? The FAA? Pshaw, right!

What happens if they decide to cut your pay or move your domicile over night and require you to move ALL of your stuff to the new city on the drop of a hat?

These are all things that I saw when I flew for a non-union regional. It's NOT pretty.

Frank Lorenzo, welcome back.

Braniff
 
Braniff and some others,

You need to educate yourself on the situation at Mesa Airlines which has caused Freedom Airlines to form. In a nutshell, ALPA!! Also, reread some of my posts at the beginning of the thread to find out how Freedom will be staffed. It will not be done the way you pointed out.

One thing I do agree with you on is that the captains who go to Freedom from Mesa will be those who do not have a desire to move on and will stay with Mesa till they retire. Therefore, the upgrade time is likely to be rather high. This is not so good for the FO's, like myself, who would like to move on someday.

BeechScrub
 
I've heard that Mesa pilots will be the ones staffing Freedom airlines. Pilots will be allowed to keep their seniority and will be on a leave of absence from Mesa. Top pay is to be around 120 per hour. I do leave this post with a small amount of hesitation. I may be bought and sold at any moment.

Boeingman I too served as a pilot in the military and have been away from my family defending this country. Thank you for defending my right to free speech, and I will accept your thanks for defending your right to be a socialist. Oh hold on a second I thought I was just bought and sold for a moment but I was wrong. Hey b-man you are probably of at least average intelligence so could you please post something that isn't censored.

Fatburger congrats on your upcoming child, they can sure be a life changer.
 
Braniff said:
If you for a moment think that Freedom Air is going to pay anywhere near scale or be anything more than flying bus drivers, you're kidding yourself.

I didn't know that the pay scales for Freedom had been announced. Anyways, it it's better then Mesa payscales as Johnny O has promised then atleast it's a start.

Then they're going to fill the FO seats with pay-for-training new pilots.

I didn't know that this had been announced either? Since when was Mesa PFT. I can't remember Mesa being PFT anytime in recent history.

I've flown for a non-union carrier before and IT IS NOT GOOD. If the company busts the FAA's duty regulations, who are you going to call? The FAA? They really don't get involved with stuff like that.

What about Skywest? Their pilots seem to be doing ok with no union.
 
AngryBoeingman,
I've been looking for petite, mid-twenty something, latin, female & since you're in the "flesh trade" business I figured if you had one to sell....
 
Bad management makes a union necessary. Problem is, once a union exists, management has to fight against labor to control cost. The union will always demand more, and management has to tell thim no. Pretty soon, managment hates labor because they are a constant thorn in the side, and will screw them over every chance they get. This sets up the adversarial relationship, which is self-perpetuating. The union can't go away, because management would roll over the pilots. Management can't back down becuase they'd go out of business if they met every demand the union made.

The reason Skywest has done alright is because they have decent management. Despite what you all may think, it is possible to have good pay and work rules without a union. Skywest's pilots are at least as happy as their unionized counterparts.

I think it is ridiculous to postulate that Freedom is going to operate with out-of seniority captains and PFT FO's, particularly when you examine Skywest. Sounds like a union scare tactic to me. Freedom will have to compete with other airlines to attract pilots, so if it's that bad, they'll go somewhere else. But if they offer better pay and rules than their unionized sister-airline, why not move?
 
Last edited:
I am so impressed with how Lorenzo managed to clone himself, just remember that if your going to fly for this sheep herder you better get yourself a good razor and clippers, cause I can see he has an unlimited supply of velcro gloves and no K-Y jelly.
Baaaaaaaaaaah!!!

Jetsnake
 
Last edited:
The pay and work rules for Freedom have not been announced yet. Mesa is not going to take captains out of seniority and PFT has never existed at Mesa. Jonathan Ornstein has described the contract that they are putting together for Freedom as having "all of the best attributes of the Skywest contract." With that being said, many Mesa pilots have suggested for some time now that their new contract (under negotiation now, sort of) should look very much like Skywest's contract.

BeechScrub
 
Pay for Training

BeechScrub


Mesa almost definitely had pay for training in the early 1990s. As I recall it was something like $10,000 for the privilege of being a new hire F.O. on a Beech 1900. I am glad to hear that they stopped it.

I had better not get started on the rest of this thread because I am still mad at Mesa for what they did to WestAir. For those Mesa pilots too young to remember it might be worth your time to find out about as it will have a direct bearing on Mr. Ornstein's strategy vis-a-vi Mesa/Freedom.
 
PFT

BeechScrub:

I'm going to need some help from the bleechers on this one. I do recall it pretty clearly though, just don't have any links or historical information to back it up with. Essentially you paid for your new hire training when hired as an F.O. It was around $10,000. The year was 1992. Surely there is a, now, senior captain there that would know the details.
 
As a SkyWest pilot I'm glad to see that many of you look at our airline favorably. In the time I've been here it has been and continues to be a great place to work. I would also agree that we have a good management team that most of the time listens to our concerns. But our "contract" is anything but. Without legal representation our contract is nothing but a handshake deal. It has no legal standing whatsoever. Someone could come in tomorrow and literally take away what we have overnight and we would have no legal recourse. Flying without a legal binding contract, and no certificate, medical protection is frankly, scary. In my opinion the dynamics of this industry simply warrant that a pilot group have representation.
 
Beechscrub:


Jonathan Ornstein has described the contract that they are putting together for Freedom as having "all of the best attributes of the Skywest contract." With that being said, many Mesa pilots have suggested for some time now that their new contract (under negotiation now, sort of) should look very much like Skywest's contract.

So you're telling me all you want to shoot for at Mesa and Freedom Air is Skywest's contract?!? Boy the managment people of the regional airline industry are so glad to have guys like you around who are just SO thrilled to be flying an airplane that pay is just relative! As a worker you get compensated based on the revenue your work produces. That Skywest payscale comes up loads short and thats with flying smaller airplanes then what Freedom Air would.
My union is right now in contract trying to bring this pay more equal to the revenue we produce. However, we won't ever suceed if guys like you are going to act happy with a slightly better status quo. That's all Mr. Orenstein wants to do, because he lacks ANY vision besides using cheap labor, just like Mr. Lorenzo. So you go settle for Skywest's contract and be happy being paid like cheap immigrant labor!
 
FOOD FOR THOUGHT

THE CONTRACT


WHEN TWO PEOPLE MEET, AN AGREEMENT MADE. THE TERMS OF THE DEAL, THE PLANS ARE LAID.

EACH ONE GIVES THEIR SEAL BY THE GRIP OF THEIR HAND. ON THEIR WORD OF HONOR THEY TAKE A STAND.

THESE DAYS THERE ARE CONTRACTS ALL WRITTEN OUT. SO THERE IS NOTHING TO DISPUTE ABOUT.

BUT IF A PERSON WON'T STAND ON HIS WORD UNDERSTOOD. A PIECE OF PAPER WON'T MAKE IT GOOD.

1994
 
Folks, lets get some facts straight.

Earl, your reference to Mesa ALPA not accepting the companys pay cut and its correlation to the furloughs is incorrect.

The VP of Flight Ops stated that the number of furloughs would be the same regardless if the pilots agreed to the paycut or not. FACT.

We requested the company show a financial need to the pilot group regarding the pay cut. A two sentence written response that did not show that need. FACT.

The company showed a profit for the fiscal year 2001(pre-tax adjustments). FACT.

Your logic seems to indicate that during a profitable year employee groups should give up pay whenever management asks. CURIOUS.

Freedom is being created to alleviate the problems created by scope restrictions in the USAirways Pilots contract.OK.

If this is true, then a non-union airline is not neccesary. We operate two certificates right now with one seniority list. Not one thing prevents management from adding another certificate under that same list.FACT.

Skywest does not have a contract. They have an agreement with management. This may be changed at anytime. Pay rates, work rules, etc....FACT.

JO could offer a great package for Freedom pilots. $110/hr. Captain pay. Two months or weeks later, say the company isn't profitable, $50/hr Captain pay, no recourse whatsoever. FACT.


The plain,cold,hard truth.
 
SaabStory said:
AngryBoeingman,
I've been looking for petite, mid-twenty something, latin, female & since you're in the "flesh trade" business I figured if you had one to sell....

Sell? Flesh trade?

Sorry, I can't help you. Try an escort service in your local area or downtown street corner.

There is also the mail order bride option.
 
earlthesquirrel said:
Thank you for defending my right to free speech, and I will accept your thanks for defending your right to be a socialist. /B]




Nice try, but I think sub consciously, you're talking about yourself.

If you had it your way we all would be working under a socialist type work environment and pay structure. That way your feelings wouldn't get hurt right?
 
BeechScrub said:
Jonathan Ornstein has described the contract that they are putting together for Freedom as having "all of the best attributes of the Skywest contract." With that being said, many Mesa pilots have suggested for some time now that their new contract (under negotiation now, sort of) should look very much like Skywest's contract.


BeechScrub,

Often the "devil is in the details". Stangely, JO didn't do all those great things for pilots at the airline he was with before Mesa.

More importantly, Skywest has no contract. They have a policy manual that the company is able to change, however and whenever it chooses. Skywest pilots are "employees at will".

Very few pilots with experience in the industry would consider that arrangement to be in their best interests. While JO may be a nice guy today, what will he be tomorrow? When he leaves, will the guy that takes his place do the same things?

If he really means to do so right by Mesa pilots, then what prevents him from recognizing the union at Freedom and making the offer to them?

Don't by a pig in a poke.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom