Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

S Turns in a 737

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Swede said:
Actually, if you look at the gear position and with the aircraft at a normal AOA for touchdown, the gear will shield the engine nicely from contact. There's no problem landing wing-low.

Swede, I'm going to have to differ just a bit here. Why do you think that the 737-300 (and up) CFM engines nacelles are flat on the bottom? I don't remember the exact amount of bank that is acceptable in the 73, but I can tell you that it isn't as much as you'd imagine. On the MD80, you can't bank more than 8 degrees without dragging a wingtip, and I'll bet that the 737 is less margin than that.

As a general statement, I do agree that the landing wasn't good, but that video shows one landing. For all we know, it could have been an initial OE trip for a newhire. Heck, it could have been the flying pilots first 121 landing, we just don't know, and until it can be proven that this particular pilot always makes crappy crosswind landings, I'm not ready to judge him as being a poor pilot.

BTW, my very first 121 DC9 approach and landing were the expressway visual to 31 at LGA. I'll never forget my first DC9 landing. Oh yeah, smooth as a babys behind. :D Just don't ask about one at TPA later that OE trip.

enigma
 
Enigma, notice I didn't say the pilot was bad, simply that the landing sucked. If one bad landing makes for a bad pilot, we'd all be in trouble!

My position on the 737 nacelle is this... when at TD AOA, the engine is higher up in the air than one might think when looking at it taxiing about. The engines are well forward of the wing, and with a few degrees of pitch, are "elevated" up away from the runway by quite a bit. Now if the touchdown is wing low, AND at a level deck angle, the pilot will have a lot more to worry about than scraping something, he's going to hit hard enough to punch that strut through the wing.

Here's a good picture to illustrate:

http://www.verslo.is/baldur/640/g-ojsw-737-640.jpg

In this picture, imagine the right tires are in contact, and the AOA is at landing, or close to it. Now, roll the airplane to the right. With the tires rather close to the right engine, the right wingtip will probably scrape before the nacelle.

Looking at my engineering outline of the B737, even at 0 degrees deck angle, a line drawn from the tires to the wingtip barely touch the bottom of the nacelle. I think people imagine the engines are farther out on the wings than they are.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top