bosdrx
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
- Posts
- 72
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really?Well Grumpy, at least I've got my information right on the TA facts.
You don't know that it will cover inflationary rates. What will 2008's inflation rate be? How about 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012? That's right, you don't know. So your information and facts are not exactly right, are they?The yearly pay raises thru 2012 (in the TA) are an increase over the CBA and will cover current inflationary rates.
....The senior guys, the ones who got the lowest percentage raise last time, but more the time before are being asked to take NO pay raise for a period of 1-8 years depending on seniority and the length of the contract. This union has all but shown what they think of the senior membership at the company, and it will only change when one of them gets to the senior point. So, all in all, your championing of a contract that benefits youI must be doing a very bad job of standing up for the FOs because my husband is a 5 yr PIC, not a member of the 600 or so at the bottom of the list that need the most help. and throws a group of 300 down a toilet is a little off of your usual, the union protects and is fair with everyone drivel.
![]()
...
What about this then: The yearly pay raises thru 2012 (in the TA) are an increase over the CBA and will cover current inflationary rates. You don't know that it will cover inflationary rates. ...Thanks for your help, UG. I had intended to type the word "trends" but inadvertently typed out "rates". My thought process was that factors like inflation were studied by those who worked on Section 27. The rates were set to cover current inflationary trends. Even if they do end up equaling the average inflation, aside from upgrades, everybody essentially has stagnant buying power and quality of life until at least 2013. Oh, except for anyone who hits 14+ years in the next 5 years. They essentially move backward every year. But keep filling us up with your rosy "facts."
An 1108 friend is supposed to e-mail it to me but hasn't yet. Our management's take is "there's nothing new here." Yeah, right.
We also don't have access to the full IBB proposal. Is there specific language vis-a-vis merger?
Articles in publications like AIN and Wall Street Journal have touted the expansion in business aviation. Apparently the owners love the service. The fracs are better situated than the airlines as far as furloughs go. After 911 NJ hired laid off pilots like my husband. He was very junior at AA and we certainly wouldn't have expected him to keep the job if it meant a pilot senior to him would lose his/hers. AT AA he had expected to be on the reserve in a hub he didn't want for years. It's the nature of the business, isn't it? Currently, NJA will open up 100 bases for junior pilots if the TA passes. Ratification will give new hires $56,875 for the 7&7 and pay $69, 188 on the reserve in 2008. Should the TA pass and NJA opt to extend it thru 2015 FOs will be making $84,330 and $102,588. 1108 leaders recognize that those most junior on the list must have wages that support a family. Low FO pay in the 2005 CBA has always bothered me because I was concerned about junior pilots (and their families) being stuck on an inadequate salary too long while waiting to upgrade. If economic factors cause the seniority list to become stagnant I'd rather see that happen with decent wages locked in and the FOs having more options of affordable bases to live in. Should growth stop completely, I'd think that job security and guaranteed wages at an attractive rate would matter more than a pilot's choice in scheduling. That said, I'm glad that NJ pilots are allowed to swap vacation slots and the TA has a provision for swapping tours as well. In addition, the company will make days available to pilots on a first come first served basis (regardless of seniority) that they can use as Paid Time Off days. I think there are far worse jobs than NJA for junior pilots. It pleases me that I can now say that. It wasn't always the case. Good luck to FOs! NJW
All the other fracs that have no representation are very quiet on these boards.
Their silence speaks volumes.
No, QOL is measured by how one feels when they are OFF work, influenced greatly by how much time one gets off each month, and how much one makes. Funny how that works.QOL isn't always measured by how much one makes or how much time one gets off each month. It's measured by how one feels when they go to work each day.
It's called sulking.Their silence speaks volumes.
Thanks for helping make my points. 1) If the increases do match inflation, we are stagnating in buying power. Why do you find that so hard to recognize? 2) "Set to cover current inflationary trends." Have you been paying attention to economists such as Alan Greenspan lately? "Current inflationary trends" have been very low the last 10 years. This will most likely NOT continue. This TA does not cover the last 10 years, it covers the next 10 years. I am glad you are so comfortable with having no increase in buying power year-over-year. I'm not.The rates were set to cover current inflationary trends.
The signing bonus will only last so long. What is a $25,000 bonus worth over the length of a 9-year contract? Not a whole lot of buying power there. Why do you refuse to recognize that longevity increases of "current inflationary trends" equates to no real yearly raise at all?I doubt those slated to receive thousands of dollars in a signing bonus consider that "stagnant buying power".
Nobody is disputing that there is a pay bump. What I am disputing is that you say it is enough to offset the concessionary changes to the contract. I believe it is not enough, and certainly not enough to lock into a 9-year deal.The fact is that everyone will get more money if IBB passes and many will get a QOL bump. 5 yr PICs could end up making over 90K more thru 2012 and new hires could earn over 120K more in those years.
The only observation I'm going to make is very simple. The majority of the posts are coming from those at NJ and Options. The ongoing issues with contracts appear to always be stirring the pot and creating some type of "issue" giving pilots something to complain about and create a distraction.
All the other fracs that have no represention are very quiet on these boards. Could it be that these folks are relatively content and that in reality they are really better places to work BECAUSE there is no representation on the property? They might not make as much money, and maybe the perks might not be so great as those appear to be with contracts but there is something to be said for the silence from them.
QOL isn't always measured by how much one makes or how much time one gets off each month. It's measured by how one feels when they go to work each day.
Their silence speaks volumes.
Gutshot,
Not to be a smart ass, but your mangement is blowing something up your backside. The language is huge and from the response I got from mangement when I questioned them on it the other day, I would say they are serious.
It isn't merger language, it is amount of international flying language.
No, QOL is measured by how one feels when they are OFF work, influenced greatly by how much time one gets off each month, and how much one makes. Funny how that works.
It's called sulking.![]()
Problem is, riding mountain bikes, waterskiing, and making love to my wife don't pay very well.Don't agree. QOL is 24/7.
QOL is based on what happens when you are AT work more than when you are off work because it allows balance. If you can't wait to get off work, then you are in the wrong career.
....
As I understand it, unless 1108 pilots are doing 85% of trans-oceanic flying by a certain date (2012 or 2013 I think), the IBB agreement cannot be extended the aditional 3 years. The only way that number can be achieved is for NJI to become an 1108 shop.
On the other hand, RTS may be planning to NOT extend the agreement the extra 3 years and doesn't care whether the 85% target is met thereby keeping NJI a non-union shop. That possibility was considered and the language includes financial penalties in the event that route is chosen. It's a formula so it sounds like it could be expensive in application. I was told that's the idea.
What I don't know, and maybe someone can answer, is whether this language will pre-empt a filing next November. There's nothing in writing, but your guess seems logical to me. It could be that BOTH sides recognize that the legal avenue would be costly and destructive with no better than a 50-50 shot for either side I agree with this viewpoint/speculation. and this is a gradual, face-saving way to integrate the seniority lists over the long term. Here, our views change slightly. I don't see it as face-saving as much as reputation saving. The owners won't be pleased if the brand name is sullied in a messy, public court case. That's not the image NJA/I pilots strive for is it? Having read the penalty language in the 85% clause, I didn't get the idea that the integration would be drawn out over a long time period. It sounds like it was written to make it cost-prohibitive for RTS to back out of the deal.
All I DO know is that NJI management is keeping any information they do have on the issue very close to the vest.
Perhaps they don't want to hear lots of complaining and/or questioning regarding a decision they can do nothing about? So they'll tell the pilots just before hand, not months in advance? I'm just guessing, but I don't think your need to know your future is as high a priority to them as theirs is right now. The pilots will all be integrated and keep working, but will the managers? They may be too preoccupied with figuring out the details to share them just yet. Regardless of the reason being in limbo is difficult and I wish you and your fellow NJI pilots the best.
NJW