Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Republic/Frontier/Midwest SLI Arbitration?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Originally Posted by StaySeated
There was also a Voluntary Leave of Absence agreement. Over 60 pilots agreed to VLOA's, most of which traveled overseas to fly in Asia and various sandbox carriers. Had these 60 folks not taken VLOA's, another 60 would have been furloughed. The 60 VLOA's that returned from VLOA were senior to the folks that were furloughed, and they returned in seniority order. No one returned out of seniority, and no "back room" deals were struck.

More like 20 went to the sandbox, India and other Asian countries. Your figure is not even close, unless the other 40 got a job within the US (very unlikely). But the interest to take a VLOA was five times as high, had the company not set an unrealistic deadline to "take it or leave it within only a few weeks", there fore not giving interested pilots enough time to find or secure another job. Another deal breaker for many F9 pilots in regard to VLOA were terms such as not a guaranteed recall for six years (vacancy is not a guarantee). Many, many more would have taken a VLOA with more flexible terms and many furloughs could have been avoided. Yet there was no genuine interest by the company to make this happen.

I said 60 VLOA's and 60 Furloughs, but now that you called me out I had to go back and check the actual numbers.....drum roll please....

46 VLOA's and 50 Furloughs. (would you like employee numbers, DOH?)

I was pretty close, and my point was that every single VLOA prevented a furlough, and none of the VLOA's took a vacancy away from a furloughed pilot.

Regarding the rest of your post, I 100% agree. The VLOA language was not perfect, and one gentlemen in management made it a point to block a number of FAPA's furlough mitigation efforts. More than one pilot was forced to resign when this person denied numerous leave requests. Ironically, this same person gave himself a long term "personal leave of absence" so he could accept another job and keep his name on the seniority list "just in case". He recently left the company, but Indianapolis is like some greek mythological creature, when one duplicitous VP leaves, two more take his place.
 
I said 60 VLOA's and 60 Furloughs, but now that you called me out I had to go back and check the actual numbers.....drum roll please....

46 VLOA's and 50 Furloughs. (would you like employee numbers, DOH?)

I was pretty close, and my point was that every single VLOA prevented a furlough, and none of the VLOA's took a vacancy away from a furloughed pilot.

Regarding the rest of your post, I 100% agree. The VLOA language was not perfect, and one gentlemen in management made it a point to block a number of FAPA's furlough mitigation efforts. More than one pilot was forced to resign when this person denied numerous leave requests. Ironically, this same person gave himself a long term "personal leave of absence" so he could accept another job and keep his name on the seniority list "just in case". He recently left the company, but Indianapolis is like some greek mythological creature, when one duplicitous VP leaves, two more take his place.

Stay,
Your love and devotion for FAPA and Frontier Airlines is admirable. Keep up the good fight!
 
I said 60 VLOA's and 60 Furloughs, but now that you called me out I had to go back and check the actual numbers.....drum roll please....

46 VLOA's and 50 Furloughs. (would you like employee numbers, DOH?)

I was pretty close, and my point was that every single VLOA prevented a furlough, and none of the VLOA's took a vacancy away from a furloughed pilot.

Regarding the rest of your post, I 100% agree. The VLOA language was not perfect, and one gentlemen in management made it a point to block a number of FAPA's furlough mitigation efforts. More than one pilot was forced to resign when this person denied numerous leave requests. Ironically, this same person gave himself a long term "personal leave of absence" so he could accept another job and keep his name on the seniority list "just in case". He recently left the company, but Indianapolis is like some greek mythological creature, when one duplicitous VP leaves, two more take his place.

Don't need their names or DOH, SSN will be just fine ... (kidding).

At the end the numbers do not matter, my intention was to highlight the fact that the VLOA thing was not as smooth as it might have sounded and thanks to the hypocrite you mentioned some people had to resign and more folks got furloughed. Not sure if there was any thing more FAPA could have done, but it really does not matter any more.

Thanks for clarifying and setting the record straight.
 
The truth is "probably somewhere in the middle" when dealing with matters of opinion.

In this case, you are just flat out wrong.

1. The furlough pilot fund had approximately $23,000 in December 2008. This from the SecTres at the time. It was also posted on the FAPA board.

2. There was a ground school that began on 4/24/2008.

3. The VLOA's clearly stated that they could return if there was an open vacancy. The furloughees returned to MKE because that was the only domicile with vacancies. No backroom deals, just vacancies being awarded in seniority order.

4. You can't advocate for pilots to stop picking up open time. It is considered an illegal job action. I am not one to pick up extra time, but picking up open time doesn't have a pronounced effect on furloughs/recalls. Take a look at the denver open time pot. If there are 15 open trips on the first three days of the month due to monthly transition, you can't recall 15 pilots to fly one sequence in the month. If there was enough open time to build a complete line of flying, a relief line would have been made. Relief lines are built prior to daily open time going live. If the company builds and awards a relief line, they lose a reserve pilot. If they lose enough reserve pilots, the hire/recall. All of this happens before the 28th of the month, when daily open time begins. Random open time during the month has zero effect on staffing.

5. ESOP was traded away for DC. End of story. Did you attend any of the road shows for CBA 2007? I don't think you were here at the time, but this was all explained very clearly, including the value of each component.

You are 0-5. Regardless, congrats on the new job and the recent airplane order. A new hire at a growing airline is probably better than the bottom of our list, all things considered.


Ok. You are right. There was money in the fund (where did it go once everyone came back?), there was a class that started post BK (6 pilots? Dont need names and DOH thanks), VLOAs could come back to an open vacancy, and open time makes no difference. Got it.

I still believe it is wrong to accept or volunteer for Junior Assignments when there are pilots out on furlough. You will never convince me that the first year pilot pay was not a pawn in the DC deal.

Thanks for the congrat..Being a new hire at a growing airline is much better that being at the bottom of Frontiers list. When the arbitrators decision finally is made public im betting that will be painfully obvious. Dont get me wrong...I wish no ill will. Frontier pilots are a great group and I have good friends in both the left and right seats there. It is a sad thing to see it all sliding downhill.

Good job in setting me straight.
 
This is completely false. The reference to seniority grabbing by the "regional pilots" may be because you feel superior to us, but whatever the reason it is out of our hands. Relax and stop trying to stir the pot. The "seat grab", as you call it, is completely fictional. I know ZERO RAH pilots that have said anything about flying a 'bus. Maybe you have, but every group has their small minority. I assure you, that is ours. The overwhelming majority of us, while speaking freely behind the closed doors of the flight deck, think you could not have been dealt any worse of a blow to your career. This place SUCKS, and Airbuses or not - we are leaving in droves. As a matter of fact, more pilots have left in the past 3 months than the last 3 years.

What you should be focusing on is the impending fight you have on your hands with management, not the pilot group. We have been through the ringer with these cronies, we know what we face, and we know that standing together is the only chance we possibly have to make any headway. The longer you stand reluctant to join us, the stronger WH and BB become.

Various friends of mine still at Lynx have overheard RAH guys on the jumpseat or on the crew bus spewing how angry they are at management; yet they will also say they can't wait until they are going to be flying the Airbus. There's also some FO's in Denver that have said they refuse to upgrade until their senority allows them to hold Denver. This is the group of pilots that makes up RAH. Pilots that don't care they put Lynx guys or Midwest guys on the street. Or care if they put Frontier guys on the street. It's just sad.

I was offered a preferential hiring with Republic and I turned it down. Bartending and reffing hockey is much more appealing to me.
 
I think those rah pilots who feel they deserve or cant wait to fly the airbus should apply at virgin america. You have a lot better shot at doing it there than at f9 for the foreseeable future.
 
Crown and Coke... I highly doubt what youve heard is true... I have heard of two people saying that and they are on the nonbranded side and pretty arrogant.

stop trying to stir the pot..its already been stirred.

The sooner we all realize that the real enemy is bedford and not ourselves the better off we will be.
 
Various friends of mine still at Lynx have overheard RAH guys on the jumpseat or on the crew bus spewing how angry they are at management; yet they will also say they can't wait until they are going to be flying the Airbus. There's also some FO's in Denver that have said they refuse to upgrade until their senority allows them to hold Denver. This is the group of pilots that makes up RAH. Pilots that don't care they put Lynx guys or Midwest guys on the street. Or care if they put Frontier guys on the street. It's just sad.

I was offered a preferential hiring with Republic and I turned it down. Bartending and reffing hockey is much more appealing to me.

I've been here 7 years (RAH) and in the pass year+ I haven't here nothing like that... but ofcourse your friend or you are not trying to put anger here at all!!! no no no his or your "overheard" is legit!! HA...please.
 
Mr. Ex Fapa President,

Instead of trying to figure out who I am, look in the mirror and find out who you are? Next time you throw catered parties for F9 managers, make sure they dont influence you to do the wrong thing.

CYA

It was a nice party. No one on either side of Management or the Union were influenced in anyway at the party or by the party.

Once (if) you gain some experience and lose some of your us-against-them angst, you'll realize that there is a time to flight for the contract, the polices, the grievances, the terminations, etc. and at the end of the day both Union and Management have a job to do.

Once that job is done, reasonable people on both sides recognize that we're all in this together, respect some of the people on either side and relationships grow out of mutual respect.

I've had shouting matches with Labor Relations over the years, there have been periods that we didn't even speak in passing, but a week or month later had lunch with them (we trade off on who buys).

It actually pays off to not hate each other. Of course that was the old Frontier. I have no idea how these relations will go with Ford & Harrison, BB and especially WH. I'm afraid my expectations are not high.

You get this experience from volunteering, working for the Union and the pilots or becoming an elected BoD member, not standing on the sidelines screaming when you have no knowledge or experience. Or even worse screaming when none of it affects you any longer.
 
The sooner we all realize that the real enemy is bedford and not ourselves the better off we will be.

With respect to the Frontier pilots (especially the FOs), Bedford may or may not be the real enemy. That is yet to be determined.

But the current real threat is at hand. That threat is the seat/seniority grab by the RAH pilots. If they are successful in their proposed SLI, current Frontier junior captains and all FOs may as well start shopping for a new job.

And that makes any later possible battle with Bedford inconsequential.
 
With respect to the Frontier pilots (especially the FOs), Bedford may or may not be the real enemy. That is yet to be determined.
But the current real threat is at hand. That threat is the seat/seniority grab by the RAH pilots. If they are successful in their proposed SLI, current Frontier junior captains and all FOs may as well start shopping for a new job.


+1
Hopefully F-9 will be sold off to B6 or some other mainline before the pillaging of our seniority list commences. To be fair, there are a lot of cool pilots that got stuck at RAH. I place the blame for the proposed rape of the F-9 seniority list on the IBT.
 
Various friends of mine still at Lynx have overheard RAH guys on the jumpseat or on the crew bus spewing how angry they are at management; yet they will also say they can't wait until they are going to be flying the Airbus. There's also some FO's in Denver that have said they refuse to upgrade until their senority allows them to hold Denver. This is the group of pilots that makes up RAH. Pilots that don't care they put Lynx guys or Midwest guys on the street. Or care if they put Frontier guys on the street. It's just sad.

I was offered a preferential hiring with Republic and I turned it down. Bartending and reffing hockey is much more appealing to me.

I can tell you're just venting, kind of like the girl that got dumped and is just looking for some comfort from her friends. I guess you need to head over to the Hockey Reffing Forum and Bartending message boards because your pity party isn't going to get any consoling here. Have a look around, nobody is happy.
 
Various friends of mine still at Lynx have overheard RAH guys on the jumpseat or on the crew bus spewing how angry they are at management; yet they will also say they can't wait until they are going to be flying the Airbus. There's also some FO's in Denver that have said they refuse to upgrade until their senority allows them to hold Denver. This is the group of pilots that makes up RAH. Pilots that don't care they put Lynx guys or Midwest guys on the street. Or care if they put Frontier guys on the street. It's just sad.

I was offered a preferential hiring with Republic and I turned it down. Bartending and reffing hockey is much more appealing to me.
Your post is so blatant I just couldn't resist. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
What were they supposed to do dueces... Propose that the pilots on their own seniority list be stapled to the bottom.
Of yours??


No one is advocating a staple in this SLI, well except for the IBT. I guess that is what you call it when you propose putting the top 300 at a regional airline in front of everyone else. What a joke! I have no problems with most RP guys / gals, but the IBT leadership is a different story.
 
With all due respect, the F9 SLI proposal did, in fact, suggest stapling all the RAH pilots below all the F9 pilots and half the YX pilots.

Yes, yes- apples to oranges, real pilots to regional pilots. However, a staple job is still a staple job.

I also think the top 300 thing is BS.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top