Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Republic/Chataqua

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
91 said:
Ironically enough, I misspelled the company's name on all of my initial paperwork I sent in to them.

Yeah, but then... You've always been kind of a buffoon. :rolleyes: Like the new avatar. Are all them biznitches yours? Or did you rent them along with the fish?

L.
 
sleddriver77 said:
Or did you rent them along with the fish?

The chicks caught the fish, with their bare hands..
 
hockeypilot44 said:
1200 of 1200 something if you fly a Saab for Shuttle America

If you're so sure of that, why won't your MEC agree to an arbitration date? Instead your reps, specifically PP, want to delay so we get furloughed and you have leverage.

Even your local and your local's attorney have agreed to the date. It seems to be only your pilot group's elected representative that wants us to lose our jobs.

Glad we're the same union...in Unity?
 
sleddriver77 said:
Yeah, but then... You've always been kind of a buffoon. :rolleyes: Like the new avatar. Are all them biznitches yours? Or did you rent them along with the fish?

L.

Buffoon or not, I always have enjoyed seafood.
 
i just went through the whole process with chq and it seems like they have no ryme or reason as to what aircraft you get...im a low timer so i completley expected and was happy when i got the 145...however there is a gentlemen in my class with over 3000 tt and 1000 mulit (no turbine) who was also assigned the 145...WHO KNOWS....the place is still da bomb though
 
FandE said:
If you're so sure of that, why won't your MEC agree to an arbitration date? Instead your reps, specifically PP, want to delay so we get furloughed and you have leverage.

Even your local and your local's attorney have agreed to the date. It seems to be only your pilot group's elected representative that wants us to lose our jobs.

Glad we're the same union...in Unity?
You forgot to mention the F/A's who were NON-UNION got date of hire while we get furloughed for leverage.
 
Just curious where my 6/99 class date would put me if I were still there ???

Anyone...???...

And yes, I'm still glad I left...
 
Rumor has it our non-union mechanics got DOH as well, don't know if CHQ's mechanics are unionized. Since we haven't heard much about them, I can only assume they have no unions involved, so the company decided DOH is Fair and Equitable.

Maybe the CHQ pilots would treat us better if we were non-union. I can't believe we actually thought being the same union as them would help.
 
FandE said:
Rumor has it our non-union mechanics got DOH as well, don't know if CHQ's mechanics are unionized. Since we haven't heard much about them, I can only assume they have no unions involved, so the company decided DOH is Fair and Equitable.

Maybe the CHQ pilots would treat us better if we were non-union. I can't believe we actually thought being the same union as them would help.

Wow. What a sad story that you tell. "RUMOR has it. I can only assume." Next when you are going to make a statement saying the company decided DOH is fair and equitable make sure you have some facts where the company actually decided something. And while your at it tell your boy to stop giving you the 1-2 Donkey Punch. Its seriously starting to have repercussions.

Horvath, please tell me that a majority of the the guys over are more like you and not douche bags like this clown.
 
I think if we're looking for an airline with less douche bags, we're all in trouble.. According to this website everyone one of them is full of them. :)
 
FandE said:
Maybe the CHQ pilots would treat us better if we were non-union. I can't believe we actually thought being the same union as them would help.

Help?? You mean give you a new start, in a brand new jet for a growing company, with better work rules, a future.......AND date of hire?

SPEAKING OF GIVING THINGS UP:
It's funny...so many Shuttle saabs out there have such a familair N Number...

Oh thats right. You guys aquired those Sabbs when Chautauqua dumped them on the street along with the pilots that flew them. Some made it back, but I believe quite a few of those guys, after being furloughed out of seniority, went to Chicago Express. What ever became of that operation and all those pilots anyways??

And the furloughed guys that went to Shuttle and stayed....did they get DOH??


PEOPLE LEAVE PLACES BETTER THAN SHUTTLE and come to CHQ to start at the bottom, Happily. You guys are narrowly missing a great opportunity to see the unemployment line and you ask for EVERYTHING??

Go look up Fair and Equitable.

T-hawk
 
Traumahawk said:
Help?? You mean give you a new start, in a brand new jet for a growing company, with better work rules, a future.......AND date of hire?

SPEAKING OF GIVING THINGS UP:
It's funny...so many Shuttle saabs out there have such a familair N Number...
T-hawk

My intent was not to argue over what is fair, I got sidetracked by Slapshot, sorry.

I don't think arguing with you will really help. Our two MEC's agreed to disagree and decided to take the case to an arbitrator. Now your MEC is not agreeing to an arbitration date in an effort to make sure we get furloughed and you guys get some leverage. I'll I'm saying is let the arbitrator decide and get this mess over with. We will all live with whatever the outcome is, why prolong it so your fellow Teamsters lose their jobs?

BTW-If you are an F/O, per your profile, how do the Saab N numbers look familiar? Those airplanes left Chautauqua over 3 years ago. Is your profile not up to date, do you enjoy being a senior F/O line holder, or are you simply not capable of getting an ATP with a type rating?
 
First thing I do every morning when I wake up is update my FlightInfo message board profile! After of course I take a nice pi$$.
 
FandE said:
My intent was not to argue over what is fair, I got sidetracked by Slapshot, sorry.

I don't think arguing with you will really help. Our two MEC's agreed to disagree and decided to take the case to an arbitrator. Now your MEC is not agreeing to an arbitration date in an effort to make sure we get furloughed and you guys get some leverage. I'll I'm saying is let the arbitrator decide and get this mess over with. We will all live with whatever the outcome is, why prolong it so your fellow Teamsters lose their jobs?

BTW-If you are an F/O, per your profile, how do the Saab N numbers look familiar? Those airplanes left Chautauqua over 3 years ago. Is your profile not up to date, do you enjoy being a senior F/O line holder, or are you simply not capable of getting an ATP with a type rating?

Oddly enough this is an exact opposite to what our MEC is telling us. I'll ask around a bit on our web board; I don't believe our EC wants to see anyone lose their jobs. I certainly don't.
 
A lot of new-hire company cheerleaders are capable of very quickly inheriting a company's culture from the old timers, throwing the smack like they were there when it happened.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top