Roger that.....
I actually I agree with most of that. My only issue is the majors have opened Pandoras box, and now they're blaming everybody else for not putting the evils, that they allowed to escape, back in the box. They simply finger point and insult those companies that they have allowed to grow.
I guess I'm just tired of the namecalling over things that are well beyond our control and those blame us for the downfall of the industry. We signed a short term contract in a poor economic environment, trying to fight an alter-ego situation, with nothing larger than 50 seats in sight. When I started here, we had mostly Saabs and I'd love to have flown one of those if it meant getting on with a major. Nobody seems to see the importance of keeping everybody on one list, instead they focus on the negatives. Since then, we've become our current airline more rapidly than anyone could have ever imagined. Nobody is happy with our contract. But right now, we have few options other than let the negotiating committee do their thing, and if it's not to our liking, vote it down and take it to strike if need be.
This time we don't have the carrot of growth and upgrade dangling in front of the new guys. Everybody here has been with us long enough to know they deserve more, no matter which seat because they may be there for awhile. The dissatisfaction of the current working environment is evident and I am confident that we will not settle on a contract just to get it over with. I fully anticipate voting the first one down, although I'd love to be surprised.
I believe our growth will work in our favor. If we vote something in that isn't a significant improvement, I'll be disappointed and will accept the scorn of those around us.
Yeah, this is coming from a possible "lifer". Although sometimes I think differently, most of the time I believe the negatives overcome the positives in terms of starting over in this industry.
I do not begrudge a single pilot that has gone to most any regional. That is the system of civilian entry that the baby boomers have put in place the last decade. If you want to be a pilot, there is not many other ways to get into the 121 business.
Now that the majors are not hiring, it's time to make sure the "lifers" have a career as well. That will stabilize the outsourcing and actually probably lead to more consolidation.
Right now, why would DAL agree to bring a jet to mainline when they can convince another company to provide the lift for 30% less, base solely on labor.
If DAL thought that a given rate was the floor that a 190 could be flown at per contract carrier or in house, there would be less tendancy to outsource.
I am advocating where all unions get on board with an association or guild and define the floor of wages in this industry and one of the most potent weapons they have is the j/s because the cheaper the carrier, the more commuters you need.
The legacy companies could be persuaded, because they are as hurt by LCC's paying below the minimum as the pilots are.
I don't see any way RAH or any other one company can turn the train around, because suppose you did get some outstanding, put everyone to shame, knee slapping contract negotiated (unlikely, and 5 years away from any TA). Your pilot group would be in danger of what every other group is, another new regional, called XXXjets flying for 40% less able to do contracts for all the majors, winning all the RFP's until they are cash rich and decide to go it alone.
COMAIR had a regional industry leading contract for some time after their strike I believe, look how that has ultimately turned out. If they flew their jets at 50% less than the other DCI carriers, what do you think their load of the DCI contracts would be today?
Once you had a labor association or guild, you'd have much consolidation as then being bigger would be better since labor is not in the equation of cost control.
LUV