Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Reliability Gulf - Dassault ?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
"Believe me it's me, it's every mfr . and selling the first fly by wire corporate jets is a tough sale"

This technology has been is Dassault fighter jets for many years. It will be an easy transfer to the 7X. The same cannot be said for Gulfstream, as they don't have a fighter program to transfer technology from like Dassault has.
 
sleepy said:
"Believe me it's me, it's every mfr . and selling the first fly by wire corporate jets is a tough sale"

This technology has been is Dassault fighter jets for many years. It will be an easy transfer to the 7X. The same cannot be said for Gulfstream, as they don't have a fighter program to transfer technology from like Dassault has.

Not Gulfstream, but "mother" is General Dynamics; now they have way more experience than Dassault.
 
fokkerjet said:
Not Gulfstream, but "mother" is General Dynamics; now they have way more experience than Dassault.

Not anymore - they sold their fighter division (Ft. Worth) - the one that would presumably have all their FBW-experienced engineers - to Lockheed Martin.

Of course, they could always hire the "Skunk Works" as a technology contractor - don't think that they have a product line conflict there.
 
Last edited:
FBW Systems aren't build by GD or LM, NO, the "owner" (developer) of that technology is HONEYWELL, GD, LM, Emb (the big WSCofD), and Bomardier, buids the airframe, not subsystems.

Just Look at Google ("Honeywell Fly By Wire"), their system is more less the same in the B777, BC17, EMB-170,....

Different case is Dassault, because their FBW system its "own".

Thales is currently developing a FBW system for an a/c currently in production ( a Global derivate?).

Also is know the Gulfstream's interest on that technology (from Honeywell).
 
Senior_Citizen said:
FBW Systems aren't build by GD or LM, NO, the "owner" (developer) of that technology is HONEYWELL, GD, LM, Emb (the big WSCofD), and Bomardier, buids the airframe, not subsystems.

Good point, although the integration responsibility and definition of control laws would be mostly on the airframe manufacturer's side.
 
mzaharis said:
Not anymore - they sold their fighter division (Ft. Worth) - the one that would presumably have all their FBW-experienced engineers - to Lockheed Martin.
QUOTE]

Thanks for that update.......I must have missed that little bit of info awhile back. Does General Dynamics build airplanes anymore; Gulfstream excluded of course?
 
Fbw

The Big G has a functioning FBW prototype. Gulfstream's strength in developing new technology lies in the engineers and pilots of Flight Test. Pilots in Flight Test include the Chief Test Pilot for the B-2 Bomber, the Chief Test pilot for the B-1 Bomber, and test pilots from the F-16 and F-14 programs. It was Gary Freeman, recipient of the Kinchlow Award, one of the F-14 guys that developed the HUD/EVS for the Gulfstream (not Glenn Connor as has been so widely reported). One of the F-16 guys wrote the algorythms for the GV Stall Warning Computer which allows for the current expanded CG range and wide range of completion options.

When Lockheed Martin was Gulfstream's risk sharing partner for the Super Sonic Business Jet, it was Gulfstream Flight Test that was tasked with developmental test - not Lockheed.

GV







~
 
Last edited:
I just had EVS installed and, had to go up with a GAC flt test pilot. One of the nicest and sharpest pilots I have ever flown with.


As far as FBW, you can say what you want about the technology already being established, yada yada. All I know is the guy in the back said "NO WAY, for $40 million let someone else work all the bugs out"
 
fokkerjet said:
Thanks for that update.......I must have missed that little bit of info awhile back. Does General Dynamics build airplanes anymore; Gulfstream excluded of course?

None that I know of, since LMCO purchased GD's Aeronautics division in 1992, I think. They're still in ground military vehicles, ships, and mostly military-oriented Information Technology, in addition to Gulfstream.
 
fokkerjet said:
Would that be currently installed in an airplane in flight test? The new G600/650 with P&W engines:D

And I heard Gulfstream leased some hanger space up at Area 51... ;) TC
 
The F5X is a rumour based on the industry practicles.
 
"Also is impressive the Airborne Support of Gulfstream, but Dassalts customers also said they have the best and most flexible warranty (possible Dassault will offer an airborne support program)."

Why does Gulfstream have such a program, and Dassault doesn't? Dassault doesn't need one, Gulfstream does.
 
sleepy said:
Why does Gulfstream have such a program, and Dassault doesn't? Dassault doesn't need one, Gulfstream does.

So, Falcons never break in the middle of nowhere? I'll be the first to admit that the 550 was pushed out too soon and has issues. But no plane is so flawless that you NEVER get stuck somewhere.TC
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom